WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: As more children with sickle cell disease survive into adulthood, they are increasingly hospitalized in both children' s and general hospitals and managed by different provider specialists. But it is unknown if hospital type and provider specialty affect patient outcomes.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:Using a large national administrative dataset, this study revealed that general hospitals were associated with higher rates of intubation and longer lengths of stay compared with children' s hospitals for adolescents and young adults with SCD admitted with acute chest syndrome. abstract OBJECTIVES: Adolescents and young adults (A/YA) with sickle cell disease (SCD) are hospitalized in both children' s and general hospitals. We determined the effect of hospital type and provider specialty on outcomes of hospitalized A/YA with SCD and acute chest syndrome (ACS). RESULTS: Of all admissions, 14 died and 45% were intubated. General hospitals had 13 deaths and were associated with higher intubation rates (predicted probability [PP], 48% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43%-52%]) and longer LOS (predicted mean LOS, 7.6 days [95% CI, 7.2-7.9]) compared with children' s hospitals (PP of intubation, 24% [95% CI, 5%-42%]; and predicted mean LOS, 6.8 days [95% CI, 5.6-5.8]). There was no difference by hospital type or provider specialty in PP of simple or exchange transfusion, or 30-day readmission.CONCLUSIONS: General hospitals carry higher intubation risks for A/YA with SCD and ACS compared with children' s hospitals. We need to better understand the drivers of these differences, including the role of staff expertise, hospital volume, and quality of ongoing SCD care.