Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3240508.3240541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-modal Preference Modeling for Product Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meng et al [32] incorporated other users' emotions towards a review to calculate the importance of this review in the training of matrix factorization model. Some methods concatenate all the reviews belonging to a user (or item) as a user (or item) document, and then employ deep learning methods to learn the continuous vector representation for the user (or item) [4,19,48,51]. For example, Transnets [4] and DeepCoNN [51] process the user and item documents with convolutional neural network to generate the vector representation for users and items.…”
Section: Review-level Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meng et al [32] incorporated other users' emotions towards a review to calculate the importance of this review in the training of matrix factorization model. Some methods concatenate all the reviews belonging to a user (or item) as a user (or item) document, and then employ deep learning methods to learn the continuous vector representation for the user (or item) [4,19,48,51]. For example, Transnets [4] and DeepCoNN [51] process the user and item documents with convolutional neural network to generate the vector representation for users and items.…”
Section: Review-level Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the methods, SCEM and SCRM3 perform better than all the other baselines without using short-term context, including their corresponding retrieval baseline, Table 1: Performance of our short-term context embedding model (SCEM) and baselines when re-ranking from the 2nd page. The number is the relative improvement of each method compared with the production model (PROD) 4 . ' − ' indicates significant worse than SCEM in paired student t-test with p ≤ 0.001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparsity problem is one of the major problems encountered by recommendation systems, and the data sparsity has a great impact on the quality of the recommendation [1]. Several attempts have been made to mitigate the negative effects of sparse data [2,15,[24][25][26]. Pazzani et al [24] alleviated the problem of sparse user interaction by introducing additional information of users.…”
Section: Sparsity In Recommendation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%