2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11541-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Real-World Applications: Some Recent Results and Current Challenges

Abstract: This chapter provides a short overview of the most significant research work that has been conducted regarding the solution of computationally expensive multi-objective optimization problems. The approaches that are briefly discussed include problem approximation, function approximation (i.e., surrogates) and evolutionary approximation (i.e., clustering and fitness inheritance). Additionally, the use of alternative approaches such as cultural algorithms, small population sizes and hybrids that use a few soluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common and basic approaches to tackle multi‐objective problems using evolutionary computation consider all but one objective as constraints or the combination of the individual objective functions into a single aggregative function [24]. Other more powerful approaches attempt to determine a Pareto‐optimal or non‐dominated set of solutions [24]. This means a set of candidate solutions offering different objective trade‐offs, and for which none of the objectives can be improved without detriment of other objective function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common and basic approaches to tackle multi‐objective problems using evolutionary computation consider all but one objective as constraints or the combination of the individual objective functions into a single aggregative function [24]. Other more powerful approaches attempt to determine a Pareto‐optimal or non‐dominated set of solutions [24]. This means a set of candidate solutions offering different objective trade‐offs, and for which none of the objectives can be improved without detriment of other objective function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOGA differs from the classical GA only in the way fitness is obtained for each individual in the population. A rank is first assigned to each solution, according to the number of chromosomes in the population by which it is dominated [24]. Then, a fitness is assigned to every solution based on its rank [30].…”
Section: Gas With Multiple Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the Map-Reduce paradigm adopted by Hadoop has been used for the parallelisation of single objective Genetic Algorithms [5,7,8,12], where the main gain is in the distributed evaluation of a single fitness function. When moving towards the need to optimize two or more objectives, the fitness evaluation itself is no longer the only expensive component [3]: The construction of the Pareto Front (PF) becomes computationally demanding [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from single-objective optimization, the task of multiobjective optimization is to achieve a set of optimal nondominated solutions uniformly distributed in the objective space. Due to the inherent ability of evolving a swarm of solutions simultaneously at a generation, evolution algorithms have been widely adopted in multiobjective optimization [20,21]. Among the multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), multiobjective differential evolution (MODE) has achieved a lot of successful applications, especially in practical industries, due to its simple but effective search mechanism [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Brief Introduction Of Multiobjective Differentialmentioning
confidence: 99%