2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68024-4_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimization for FDM Process Parameters with Evolutionary Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the best bottom surface quality was achieved when the printing speed was set at the lowest value (60 mm/sec). This result seemed to agree with the suggestion that surface quality was improved when printing speed was low (Yodo and Dey, 2021). Moreover, if the FFF was operated at higher printing speed, Ra (bottom) linearly increased until printing speed reached 100 mm/sec.…”
Section: Bottom Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4, the best bottom surface quality was achieved when the printing speed was set at the lowest value (60 mm/sec). This result seemed to agree with the suggestion that surface quality was improved when printing speed was low (Yodo and Dey, 2021). Moreover, if the FFF was operated at higher printing speed, Ra (bottom) linearly increased until printing speed reached 100 mm/sec.…”
Section: Bottom Surface Roughnesssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The studied parameters by the proposed computational model provide insight and understanding of how these process parameters tune the properties such as voids and mechanical properties. To optimize the entire FDM method, the proposed model could be combined with the optimization algorithm enhancing the effectiveness of the model (Chohan et al , 2022; Fountas and Vaxevanidis, 2021; Yodo and Dey, 2021). Future research is directed toward developing the optimized model by using algorithms in conjunction with the developed computational model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms have been based on the findings obtained from their implementation in operating computer numerical control (CNC) equipment. Some practical algorithms for FFF have been the robot path optimization for machining [35], the Genetic Algorithm (GA) for the reduction of tool travel time without adding value to the component (tool air time) [36], the GA for optimization of the operating parameters and reduction of operating times [37,38], recently Yodo & Dey [39] presented their proposal for multi-objective optimization based on evolutionary algorithms.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%