Compstat 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46900-8_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Scaling on the Sphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
616
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(621 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
616
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the unit disk experiment are seen in Figure 6. The actual Isomap 2-dimensional embedding was optimally rotated and scaled using a Procrustes rotation [7] to match it to the original parameter space for graphical presentation. Isomap almost perfectly recovers the original spacing and relative positioning of the disk centers.…”
Section: Rigid Translation Of a Single Diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the unit disk experiment are seen in Figure 6. The actual Isomap 2-dimensional embedding was optimally rotated and scaled using a Procrustes rotation [7] to match it to the original parameter space for graphical presentation. Isomap almost perfectly recovers the original spacing and relative positioning of the disk centers.…”
Section: Rigid Translation Of a Single Diskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of similarity, or metric, is central to many well-known algorithms such as k-means clustering [1], k-nearest neighbors [2], multi-dimensional scaling [3] and semi-supervised clustering [4]. While there are many approaches to metric learning, a large body of work is focussed on learning the Mahalanobis distance, which amounts to learning a feature-space transformation and computing the distance in the transformed space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MDS, objects are placed in a Euclidean space while preserving the distance between objects in the space as well as possible. Reviews of the extensive literature on MDS were provided by Davison (1983), Young (1987), Borg and Groenen (2005), and Cox and Cox (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%