2013
DOI: 10.1149/2.018309jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilayered Nanoclusters of Platinum and Gold: Insights on Electrodeposition Pathways, Electrocatalysis, Surface and Bulk Compositional Properties

Abstract: and surface-to-near surface distribution of Pt and Au appeared to be influenced by the stoichiometry of the surface redox-replacement reactions and sequential dealloying processes through which the nanoclusters were synthesized. Interactions between metal centers, carbon and oxygen containing surface functional groups on the glassy carbon appeared to have played a significant role in the overall stabilization and catalytic activity of the nanoclusters. Profound effects were also found on interfacial charge-tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cycles, the negatively decreasing scanning tunnelling microscopy of UPD on Au (111) and Pt clusters generated via successive SLRR reactions [14], where a somewhat bimetallic mixed substrate between Au and Pt was suggested to form during initial UPD/SLRR cycles on Au(111) substrate. Moreover, the models explored here also cement our earlier observations [13] on unique electrocatalytic properties of bimetallic and multilayered nanostructured electrode systems generated via sequential electrodeposition involving SLRR reactions.…”
Section: Gibbs Free Energy Variations During Successive Slrr Reactionssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cycles, the negatively decreasing scanning tunnelling microscopy of UPD on Au (111) and Pt clusters generated via successive SLRR reactions [14], where a somewhat bimetallic mixed substrate between Au and Pt was suggested to form during initial UPD/SLRR cycles on Au(111) substrate. Moreover, the models explored here also cement our earlier observations [13] on unique electrocatalytic properties of bimetallic and multilayered nanostructured electrode systems generated via sequential electrodeposition involving SLRR reactions.…”
Section: Gibbs Free Energy Variations During Successive Slrr Reactionssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Electrochemical deposition of transition metals, with atomic control using single-step or multistep surface-limited redox-replacement (SLRR) reactions, is of fundamental and potential technological importance in fabrication of monolayer-decorated nanoparticles, monolayercoated surfaces, epitaxial ultra-thin films, as well as multilayered nanoclusters [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In a typical SLRR reaction (Reaction (1)), an adlayer of a metal M formed electrochemically through underpotential deposition (UPD) [15,16] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLRR cycles are controlled by the custom software that serves to open and close valves based on prescribed duration and/or potential thresholds with a main objective to run successively electrolytes with specific functionality and rinsing water as needed for multi-cycle SLRR deposition [47]. Some sophistications of the flow-cell approach proposed recently by Cukrowski et al led to the development of a setup with exchangeable cells with controlled hydrodynamic flux profile that enable controlled electrolyte hydrodynamics capability [54]. The versatility of that setup allows for studies not only of a single metal deposition but also for investigation of alloy and multilayer growth by SLRR based protocols [47,54].…”
Section: The Flow-cell Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some sophistications of the flow-cell approach proposed recently by Cukrowski et al led to the development of a setup with exchangeable cells with controlled hydrodynamic flux profile that enable controlled electrolyte hydrodynamics capability [54]. The versatility of that setup allows for studies not only of a single metal deposition but also for investigation of alloy and multilayer growth by SLRR based protocols [47,54]. The key advantage of the flow-cell approach is its natural suitability for insitu monitoring of the morphology, structure and even composition of the growing layer by coupling the deposition cell with scanning probe microscopy (STM, AFM), low energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger Spectroscopy, etc setups [47,54,55].…”
Section: The Flow-cell Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a search of bimetallic or trimetallic catalysts that show improved activity for formic acid oxidation (FAO) with respect to the best electrode materials of Pd and Pt, galvanic replacement has been used as preparation route (see, for example, [126,[236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247][248][249][250][251][252][253]). These include Pt(Ag) and Pd(Ag) [232,241,244], PdAu and PtAu [237,238,245,246,252], PdPb [239], Pt(Bi) [124], Pd(Ni) [249] and Pd(Cu) [247,248] bimetallics as well as Pd(CuFe) [250] and Pt(PdFe) [253] trimetallic systems. The performance improvement of these systems is interpreted in terms of CO poison desorption from Pt in the presence of other metals (where the dehydration mechanism of FAO is operative [235]), and in terms of carbonaceous intermediates removal in the case of Pd (where the dehydrogenation mechanism prevails [235]).…”
Section: Methanol Formic Acid and Ethanol Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%