2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.14_suppl.2056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of CC-5013 in 15 multiple myeloma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure in rabbits at this dosage is approximately equivalent to lenalidomide exposure in multiple myeloma patients administered a clinical dosage of 25 mg for 28 days (Wu and Scheffler, 2004). At that dosage, AUC 0-24 hr was 2234 ng  hr/ml and C max was 591 ng/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Exposure in rabbits at this dosage is approximately equivalent to lenalidomide exposure in multiple myeloma patients administered a clinical dosage of 25 mg for 28 days (Wu and Scheffler, 2004). At that dosage, AUC 0-24 hr was 2234 ng  hr/ml and C max was 591 ng/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the approved doses of lenalidomide have been in 2 hematologic malignancies, dosing information and toxicity may not be particularly relevant in patients with refractory solid tumors, with most patients presenting with adequate bone marrow reserve despite advanced stages of disease. Furthermore, in vitro studies using lenalidomide suggest that tumor growth effects were observed at concentrations higher than what is achieved in the clinics, although good immunomodulatory effects have been observed at similar clinical concentrations, as has been indicated by activity of lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma and MDS 27 , 28 . These may partly explain why angiogenic effects of lenalidomide monotherapy have not yet been fully realized in solid tumors because these are considered highly angiogenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary to this, the presence of non-viable cells within these colonies suggests a cytotoxic effect (Alley et al, 1982); however, the concentrations of IMiDs used in the soft agar assay were not cytotoxic (Figure 1). Parenthetically, these concentrations were used in all the in vitro studies as they were clinically relevant and achievable in patients (Wu and Scheffler, 2004). These data suggested that the ability to initiate colony development independently of anchorage was not affected, whereas the ability to maintain growth of these colonies was compromised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%