2013
DOI: 10.7582/gge.2013.16.4.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Lapse Time Window Analysis of the Korean Peninsula Considering Focal Depth

Abstract: The recent Multiple Lapse Time Window (MLTW) analysis of Korean Peninsula event showed that the focal depth was far greater influence factor than the velocity structure of the model, applying the analysis of the direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method. Thus, using the events with focal depth of about 10 km, this study considered 330 paths connecting 41 events and 71 stations, and re-examined uniform and depth-dependent velocity models previously studied. As a result, the residual of misfit function greatly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the large difference in the Q values according to the depth, only a few of the previously reported MLTWA studies have considered between the shallow crust and the upper-mantle source (Badi et al, 2009). Recently, our review on MLTWA, where the focal depth range was narrowed around 10 km in South Korea (hereafter S. Korea), showed remarkably different attenuation values (Chung and Asep, 2013) compared to those of the other studies Chung, 2014) that used various focal depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In spite of the large difference in the Q values according to the depth, only a few of the previously reported MLTWA studies have considered between the shallow crust and the upper-mantle source (Badi et al, 2009). Recently, our review on MLTWA, where the focal depth range was narrowed around 10 km in South Korea (hereafter S. Korea), showed remarkably different attenuation values (Chung and Asep, 2013) compared to those of the other studies Chung, 2014) that used various focal depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…These DSMC analyses, however, assumed all events to be at a 10 km focal depth, in spite of the uninformed depths for numerous events. Chung and Asep (2013) reexamined S. Korea using events with ∼10 km focal depth and reported the highest Q i and Q S values among the previous studies.…”
Section: Previous Studies For S Koreamentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small magnitude of event 5 is attributed to larger M sum of DSMC-2 than that of DSMC-1, in spite of the second-most numerous recorded stations. In Figure 7, the Q s -1 values for DSMC-2 are low compared with those for DSMC-1 and Chung and Asep's (2013) results, which were also performed by DSMC-1. However, the Q s -1 values are consistent with the Q s -1 values obtained by Lee et al (2010) in Kyeongsang Basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our data are based on the study by Chung and Asep (2013), which used 41 events during the period of 1999 -2009. Each event of depth and magnitude ranges from 6.1 to 16.9 km and from 2.0 to 4.8, respectively, which were recorded by 3 to 18 stations operated by the Korea Meteorological Agency (KMA) and the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM).…”
Section: Data and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%