2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Olpidium bornovanus, O. brassicae, and O. virulentus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiation of these two species is only possible at a molecular level. Application of a multiplex PCR based test, using specific primers (Herrera-Vásquez et al 2009) for each of the two Olpidium species, clearly identified the fungus captured by B. pekinensis in the olive orchard soil as O. brassicae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differentiation of these two species is only possible at a molecular level. Application of a multiplex PCR based test, using specific primers (Herrera-Vásquez et al 2009) for each of the two Olpidium species, clearly identified the fungus captured by B. pekinensis in the olive orchard soil as O. brassicae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primer specific for O. virulentus (OLPvirF) and a primer specific for O. brassicae (OLPbraF) were used together with one common reverse primer (OLPR) (Herrera-Vásquez et al 2009) in a multiplex PCR assay. DNA of O. brassicae and O. virulentus used as positive controls in PCR assays were kindly supplied by Herrera-Vasquez.…”
Section: Olpidium Spp Recovery and Molecular Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A primer specific for O. virulentus (OLPvirF) and a primer specific for O. brassicae (OLPbraF) were used together with one common reverse primer (OLPR) in a multiplex PCR assay (Herrera-Vasquez et al 2009). Amplified products were separated by electrophoresis in 1 % agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer (0.1 M Tris, 0.09 M boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.4) at 80 V and stained with 0.2 μg ml −1 ethidium bromide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, el virus nunca se transmitió a plantas sanas regadas con el percolado obtenido del riego de plantas únicamente infectadas con PepMV, lo que pone de manifiesto que el virus no se transmite con el agua de riego sin la presencia del vector, contrariamente a los resultados obtenidos en otros estudios que determinan la distribución del virus en sistemas hidropónicos (Fakhro et al, 2005;Schwarz et al, 2007). Asimismo, Herrera-Vásquez et al, 2009b) en el agua de drenaje obtenida tras el riego de plantas infectadas con dicho agente, mientras que PepMV estaba presente únicamente en las muestras de agua de drenaje procedente de plantas infectadas con el virus y el hongo vector.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified