2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.528071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplexed high-throughput image cytometry using encoded carriers

Abstract: Image cytometry has made possible the collection and analysis of multiparameter cellular information. The wider use of image cytometry in drug screening will depend on its throughput, efficiency, repeatability, and on the added benefits compared with less sophisticated but faster methods. Throughput (number of datapoints per unit of time) and efficiency (number of datapoints from the given amount of reagents or plate area) are addressed here by screening multiple cell lines simultaneously using encoded carrier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Z′ score is considered acceptable for cell-based assays, further validating the functional assay and the image analysis algorithm 14. The V score, unlike the Z′ score, takes into account data points that are not complete positives or negatives (i.e., concentration-dependent response) 15. Using the camptothecin concentration response curves generated with this automated assay, we obtained a V score of 0.97 out of 1.00 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Z′ score is considered acceptable for cell-based assays, further validating the functional assay and the image analysis algorithm 14. The V score, unlike the Z′ score, takes into account data points that are not complete positives or negatives (i.e., concentration-dependent response) 15. Using the camptothecin concentration response curves generated with this automated assay, we obtained a V score of 0.97 out of 1.00 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…14 The V score, unlike the Z′ score, takes into account data points that are not complete positives or negatives (i.e., concentration-dependent response). 15 Using the camptothecin concentration response curves generated with this automated assay, we obtained a V score of 0.97 out of 1.00 (Fig. 5), which again indicates the robustness of the assay parameters.…”
Section: Parameters For Pnc Detection and Assay Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The DOE was then analyzed based on the EC50 titers and confidence limits, V-factor and dynamic range. The V-factor gives a realistic measure of the overall assay performance by accounting for intermediate points in the dose-response curve that have higher variability due to effects of computation and dispensing errors [34]. V-factor is calculated by using the formula V À Factor ¼ 1 À 6 mean ðsÞ jsrÀ snj where σ is standard deviation (SD) of the curve and σp is the SD for positive control and σn is SD for negative control [35].…”
Section: Assay Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardization of quality control in high throughput screening through the use of the Z’-factor [22, 26], or the strictly standardized mean difference [27], has enabled comparison of assay performance over a wide range of assay types, routine monitoring of assay performance during a screen, and a statistical basis for understanding the impact of assay variability on the selection of hits from a screen. For dose-response assays, the V-factor, a generalization of the Z-factor, provides a robust QC measure that takes into account the complete dose-response, rather than just the maximum and minimum response [21, 28]. To be able to compare cellular heterogeneity in order to interpret the biological meaning, standards and quality control are needed to ensure reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%