2005
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2005.844456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale LMMSE-based image denoising with optimal wavelet selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One widespread method exploited for speckle reduction is wavelet shrinkage, including VisuShrink (Donoho 1994), SureShrink (Donoho 1995) and BayeShrink (Chang 2000). A wavelet-based multiscale linear minimum mean square-error estimation (LMMSE) is proposed in (Zhang 2005), where an interscale model, the wavelet coefficients with the same spatial location across adjacent scales, was combined as a vector, to which the LMMSE in then applied.…”
Section: Wavelet Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widespread method exploited for speckle reduction is wavelet shrinkage, including VisuShrink (Donoho 1994), SureShrink (Donoho 1995) and BayeShrink (Chang 2000). A wavelet-based multiscale linear minimum mean square-error estimation (LMMSE) is proposed in (Zhang 2005), where an interscale model, the wavelet coefficients with the same spatial location across adjacent scales, was combined as a vector, to which the LMMSE in then applied.…”
Section: Wavelet Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One widespread method exploited for speckle reduction is wavelet shrinkage, including VisuShrink, SureShrink [3] and BayeShrink [1]. A wavelet-based multiscale linear minimum mean square-error estimation (LMMSE) is proposed in [20], where an interscale model, the wavelet coefficients with the same spatial location across adjacent scales, was combined as a vector, to which the LMMSE in then applied.…”
Section: Speckle Filtering Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, according to experimental results on SSIM value, the denoising performance is good especially when the image has lots of textures. To prove the performance of our WMFoE method further, we use BM3D [11], LMMSE [12], GHP [13] and FoE [4] for comparison. The codes of all the method above for comparison is provided by the authors on the Internet and we use the authors' parameters setting.…”
Section: B Image Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%