2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensory integration and cross-modal learning in synaesthesia: A unifying model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of AB, direct comparison of colours for musical notes before and after the most severe set of events (recorded in 2012 and 2015; Figure 2a) shows a number of changes but an overall high level of consistency (0.69). These findings provide strong evidence that the neural substrates of synaesthetic associations, once they are consolidated in what is presumably an early critical period (Newell & Mitchell, 2015), remain "hard--wired" thereafter and can persist over very long periods even under conditions that alter or completely suppress the conscious synaesthetic experience itself. on three successive occasions using a colour--picker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In the case of AB, direct comparison of colours for musical notes before and after the most severe set of events (recorded in 2012 and 2015; Figure 2a) shows a number of changes but an overall high level of consistency (0.69). These findings provide strong evidence that the neural substrates of synaesthetic associations, once they are consolidated in what is presumably an early critical period (Newell & Mitchell, 2015), remain "hard--wired" thereafter and can persist over very long periods even under conditions that alter or completely suppress the conscious synaesthetic experience itself. on three successive occasions using a colour--picker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…a) shows a number of changes but an overall high level of consistency (0.69). These findings provide strong evidence that the neural substrates of synaesthetic associations, once they are consolidated in what is presumably an early critical period (Newell & Mitchell, ), remain ‘hard‐wired’ thereafter and can persist over very long periods even under conditions that alter or completely suppress the conscious synaesthetic experience itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Hubbard (2007) describes four neural models of the synaesthetic experience which attribute the phenomenon to cross-activation between adjacent cortical regions (due to decreased pruning of prenatal pathways), disinhibited long-range feedback in multisensory areas, feedback in re-entrant processing circuits in visual areas and beyond, and/or overactivation of parietally driven binding mechanisms (hyperbinding). Bargary & Mitchell (2008) also argue for structural differences as a parsimonious explanation, which can be reconciled with a role for learning in the emergence of specific associations (Newell & Mitchell (2016)). Neuroimaging studies have not distinguished between these models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude our issue with the contribution from Newell and Mitchell (2016). The authors propose a model for the origin of synaesthetic associations that reconciles connectivity and innate ability models of synaesthesia with the influence of learning and crossmodal statistical regularities in the world around us.…”
Section: The Issuementioning
confidence: 85%