2009
DOI: 10.1177/0191453709106241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitude against Empire

Abstract: In the final section of their work Empire, Hardt and Negri discuss the coming into being of the multitude, the unified force that overthrows the system of ‘Empire’. Absent from the account of this unification of the multitude is the influence of religion. I endeavor to show that contrary to Hardt’s and Negri’s assumption, religion is not dissipating among the multitude and that its impact will be contrary to the creation of a unified multitude. Thus the creation of the unified multitude requires an absence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus I cannot agree with Connolly (2005: 150-1) and McDaniel (2009) that Hardt and Negri overlook the element of religion in contemporary politics. It is rather that they overlook the importance of non-Christian, and indeed non-monotheistic, religions, many of whose problems and practices were developed by encounters with Christianity.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus I cannot agree with Connolly (2005: 150-1) and McDaniel (2009) that Hardt and Negri overlook the element of religion in contemporary politics. It is rather that they overlook the importance of non-Christian, and indeed non-monotheistic, religions, many of whose problems and practices were developed by encounters with Christianity.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 81%