Diverse meanings of 'sovereignty' and 'exchange' force us to interrogate the implicit ontology of states and the associated assumptions about will, matter and spirit used by political theorists, evoking different religious and political traditions. This article contrasts the notion of 'sovereignty' found in Joseph Tonda's Le Souverain Moderne (2005) with the one found in Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's Empire (2000). Tonda's text, I argue, challenges and complicates the appropriateness of referring to early Christianity as a model for resistance to global capitalism in Empire. To help with this contrast, I draw on two Central African authors, Emmanuel Dongala (2006) andJoseph Mwantuali (2007), whose novels illustrate the supernatural as well as thoroughly material significance of state power, wealth and sexuality in the modern Sovereign.