2015
DOI: 10.14334/jitv.v20i2.1162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of morphometric traits of three different indigenous cattle populations from North East states of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally the standardized canonical coefficients identify that are up to 0.3 are said to contribute to the discriminate analysis. This finding is agrees with Pundir et al [13] who informed that body traits have contributed to discriminate between populations. Table 4 showed that ear length, body length, chest girth, horn length, tail length, muzzle circumference and cannon bone circumference were selected among cows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally the standardized canonical coefficients identify that are up to 0.3 are said to contribute to the discriminate analysis. This finding is agrees with Pundir et al [13] who informed that body traits have contributed to discriminate between populations. Table 4 showed that ear length, body length, chest girth, horn length, tail length, muzzle circumference and cannon bone circumference were selected among cows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to Pundir et al [13] stepwise discriminate analysis showed that height at wither, body length, ear length, tail length, paunch girth and face were the most discriminating variables between these three cattle populations in North East India. Studies, Yakubu et al [2] reported that height at wither and face length most discriminating traits in two distinct cattle breeds.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences of morphometrics between cattle breeds with the same age might be caused by genetic factors. Therefore, four (4) discriminant variables that were obtained in this study can Mizoram (82.09%), Manipur (79.87%), Bunaji (85.48%), Sokoto Gudali (96.55%), Pasundan (100%) and Ongole (100%) cattle into their original breed group [8,9,11]. Despite, the CDA of morphometrics able to classify the Eritrean cattle at highland (77.0%), lowland (100%) and coastland (78%) into their original population [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although using genomic information is more accurate for breed differentiation, discrimination of breeds with morphometric measurement can be a first step to observe similarity among livestock breeds [7]. Previous studies have been used the morphometrical measurements to differentiate between breeds of cattle in India [8], Nigeria [9], Ethiopia [10] and Indonesia [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Лінійний Дискримінантний Аналіз (ЛДА) широко використовується в дослідженнях, що пов'язані із виробництвом та переробкою тваринницької продукції. Найчастіше він використовується для порівняння худоби різних порід (або внутрішньопородних груп) на підставі екстер'єрних ознак будови тіла (Yakubu et al, 2010;Pundir et al, 2015). ЛДА виявився ефективним інструментом для визначення головних відмінностей між коровами м'ясних та молочних порід із нормальним отеленням та тварин, які мали проблеми під час отелення (дистоція), що дало змогу прогнозування виникнення можливих ускладнень на підставі низки ознак корови (Morrison et al, 1985;Basarab et al, 1993;Zaborski et al, 2018).…”
Section: вступunclassified