2020
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00323-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Murine Cross-Reactive Nonneutralizing Polyclonal IgG1 Antibodies Induced by Influenza Vaccine Inhibit the Cross-Protective Effect of IgG2 against Heterologous Virus in Mice

Abstract: Annual vaccination against influenza viruses is the most reliable and efficient way to prevent and control annual epidemics and protect from severe influenza disease. However, current split influenza vaccines are generally not effective against antigenically mismatched (heterologous) strains. To broaden the protective spectrum of influenza vaccines, adjuvants that can induce cross-reactive antibodies with cross-protection via Fc-mediated effector functions are urgently sought. Although IgG2 antibodies are gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mice were immunized with SV alone, SV plus alum, SV plus CpG–ODN, or SV plus CpG/alum and the levels of SV-specific total mIgG, mIgG1, mIgG2b, and mIgG2c were measured in the plasma after the last immunization ( Figure 1 A). As reported previously ( Shibuya et al., 2020 ), SV plus CpG–ODN induced significantly higher levels of SV-specific mIgG2b and mIgG2c than SV alone and SV plus alum, whereas the level of SV-specific mIgG1 in SV plus alum-immunized mice was significantly higher than that in SV alone-immunized mice and SV plus CpG–ODN-immunized mice ( Figure 1 A). Mice immunized with SV plus CpG/alum showed significantly higher levels of SV-specific total mIgG, mIgG1, mIgG2b, and mIgG2c than those immunized with SV plus alum and SV plus CpG–ODN ( Figure 1 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Mice were immunized with SV alone, SV plus alum, SV plus CpG–ODN, or SV plus CpG/alum and the levels of SV-specific total mIgG, mIgG1, mIgG2b, and mIgG2c were measured in the plasma after the last immunization ( Figure 1 A). As reported previously ( Shibuya et al., 2020 ), SV plus CpG–ODN induced significantly higher levels of SV-specific mIgG2b and mIgG2c than SV alone and SV plus alum, whereas the level of SV-specific mIgG1 in SV plus alum-immunized mice was significantly higher than that in SV alone-immunized mice and SV plus CpG–ODN-immunized mice ( Figure 1 A). Mice immunized with SV plus CpG/alum showed significantly higher levels of SV-specific total mIgG, mIgG1, mIgG2b, and mIgG2c than those immunized with SV plus alum and SV plus CpG–ODN ( Figure 1 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To examine the contribution of cross-reactive non-neutralizing antibodies for conferring a strong cross-protection by the CpG/alum-adjuvanted vaccine, serum samples from immunized or PBS-treated control mice were mixed with PR8 in vitro and transferred into naive mice intranasally ( Figures 3 A and 3B (low virus titer) and Figure S3 (high virus titer)). As reported previously ( Shibuya et al., 2020 ), the serum obtained from mice immunized with SV plus CpG–ODN suppressed body weight loss and improved the survival upon transfer than that obtained from PBS-treated control mice, while the serum obtained from mice immunized with SV plus alum did not improve body weight loss and survival ( Figures 3 A, 3B and S3 ). Furthermore, the serum obtained from mice immunized with SV plus CpG/alum did not show an improvement in body weight loss and survival upon transfer ( Figures 3 A, 3B and S3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 100 In contrast, IgG1 antibodies against influenza virus were shown to inhibit the cross-protective effect of IgG2 antibodies after vaccination in mice, suggesting that antibody isotypes play a major role in pathogen control. 101 Other mechanisms by which non-neutralizing antibodies enhance or antagonize the immune response have been reviewed. 102 Vaccine design should focus on targeting conserved, protective epitopes and inducing the proper Ig subtype, perhaps by manipulating the presentation of the antigen and/or by selecting adjuvants that will enhance the antibody repertoire as shown for influenza and human papilloma virus.…”
Section: Overcoming Diversity To Develop Cross-protective Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%