1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00329945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenicity of ozone in different repair-deficient strains of Escherichia coli

Abstract: The mutagenic activity of ozone was investigated by the isolation of streptomycin-resistant mutants (Smr) in different strains of Escherichia coli. RecA, lexA, polA and parental strains were ozonated and streptomycin-resistant mutants were scored after a short or long phenotypic delay. Our results suggest that ozone is an active mutagen for forward mutation and that this oxidizing agent could be able to induce mutations via two mechanisms: directly and indirectly by the rec-lex error-prone repair system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ozone and singlet oxygen have both been shown to cause DNA damage in vivo and in vitro, their roles in oxidative mutagenesis remain controversial (51,63,68,145,199,230).…”
Section: Oxidative Damage and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ozone and singlet oxygen have both been shown to cause DNA damage in vivo and in vitro, their roles in oxidative mutagenesis remain controversial (51,63,68,145,199,230).…”
Section: Oxidative Damage and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most, if not all, living organisms require defensive systems to protect against active oxygen species. Substantial attention has been paid to the relative roles of superoxide (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H202), the hydroxyl radical (OH'), and singlet oxygen in mediating, directly or indirectly, damage to cellular components (4,6,12,23,25,32,37). Parallel attention has been paid to the roles of enzymes that may function as protective scavengers of active oxygen species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, therefore, nonthermal plasma mutagenesis shows special advantages for it may overcome the abovementioned shortcomings, and in fact, it has currently gained increasing attention for its usage in mutagenesis [ 33 ]. In nonthermal plasma, in addition to the critical effects of charged particles and the induced reactive species [ 34 ], other factors, such as UV [ 35 , 36 ] and ozone [ 37 , 38 ], may also play important roles in the induction of gene mutations and the improvement of mutagenesis efficiency. In particular, as one of the popular plasma techniques, dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) nonthermal plasma has emerged to be an effective approach for microbe mutagenesis because it does not require a vacuum system and is characterized by a low temperature treatment, high concentration of active species, good uniformity of discharge, simple operation, rapid mutation, high mutation rate and strong controllability [ 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%