2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08357-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MutationalPatterns: the one stop shop for the analysis of mutational processes

Abstract: Background The collective of somatic mutations in a genome represents a record of mutational processes that have been operative in a cell. These processes can be investigated by extracting relevant mutational patterns from sequencing data. Results Here, we present the next version of MutationalPatterns, an R/Bioconductor package, which allows in-depth mutational analysis of catalogues of single and double base substitutions as well as small inserti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pairwise comparisons as described above were used to determine which mutation types were significantly increased from VC. Subsequently, we generated a 96-trinucleotide mutation spectrum and used cosine similarity to determine the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) single base substitutions (SBS) signatures (Alexandrov et al 2020) that most closely resembled the PRC mutation spectra, using the MutationalPatterns package in R (Manders et al 2022).…”
Section: Mutation Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise comparisons as described above were used to determine which mutation types were significantly increased from VC. Subsequently, we generated a 96-trinucleotide mutation spectrum and used cosine similarity to determine the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) single base substitutions (SBS) signatures (Alexandrov et al 2020) that most closely resembled the PRC mutation spectra, using the MutationalPatterns package in R (Manders et al 2022).…”
Section: Mutation Data Interpretation and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All SNVs and INDELs that passed these filters were visually checked in the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) [ 21 ] and ambiguous ones were further discarded. The SNV mutational signatures were analyzed and fit to the COSMIC signatures using the R/Bioconductor MutationalPatterns package [ 22 ], in which a strict refitting function “fit_to_signatures_strict” and a cutoff of 0.004 were applied. Of note, we identified a potential cross-contamination between two replicates (replicate 1 and replicate 3) of the C+ strain MALs based on finding a high proportion of shared mutations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutational signatures analysis was performed using the Mutational Patterns R packages (v3.6.0) 22 . Due to the limited number of mutations across all samples ( n = 367), mutations were pooled to increase analytical power.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%