2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63772-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutualistic cross-feeding in microbial systems generates bistability via an Allee effect

Abstract: In microbial ecosystems, species not only compete for common resources but may also display mutualistic interactions as a result from metabolic cross-feeding. Such mutualism can lead to bistability. Depending on the initial population sizes, species will either survive or go extinct. Various phenomenological models have been suggested to describe bistability in mutualistic systems. However, these models do not account for interaction mediators such as nutrients. In contrast, nutrient-explicit models do not pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major caveat to the black queen hypothesis is an innate vulnerability of mutualistic cross-feeding relationships to invasion by cheaters that benefit from the public goods without contributing ( 68 ). As such, mutualistic cross-feeding is expected to be (i) the most stable in structured environments ( 69 ), where access to the public goods can be limited; (ii) subject to Allee effects ( 70 ), where an optimal ratio of each cooperator type exists, maximizing metabolic efficiency and population size while also reducing an excess availability of public goods that may otherwise encourage the evolution of cheaters; and (iii) beneficial under resource-limited conditions ( 15 ), where cooperation can help maintain genetic variation. All of these conditions appear to be true for our experimental populations, as 10-day feast/famine cycles result in increased biofilm formation and an optimum 1:2 ratio exists between ecotypes for maximum population fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major caveat to the black queen hypothesis is an innate vulnerability of mutualistic cross-feeding relationships to invasion by cheaters that benefit from the public goods without contributing ( 68 ). As such, mutualistic cross-feeding is expected to be (i) the most stable in structured environments ( 69 ), where access to the public goods can be limited; (ii) subject to Allee effects ( 70 ), where an optimal ratio of each cooperator type exists, maximizing metabolic efficiency and population size while also reducing an excess availability of public goods that may otherwise encourage the evolution of cheaters; and (iii) beneficial under resource-limited conditions ( 15 ), where cooperation can help maintain genetic variation. All of these conditions appear to be true for our experimental populations, as 10-day feast/famine cycles result in increased biofilm formation and an optimum 1:2 ratio exists between ecotypes for maximum population fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this study we contribute to the emerging recognition of dynamic Allee effects (Tirronen et al, 2022) that can interact with the environment (e.g. (Berec, 2019;Vet et al, 2020;Winter et al, 2020)). We find that Allee effects are common in Atlantic cod and are highly dynamic under different spawner weight and SST conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [3], a discrete model of mutualism was studied with the aim of investigating the persistent property of the system. S. Vent et al in [28], have studied a model of two mutualistic species via cross-feeding in a chemostat. This model was reduced from a six-dimensional system to a two-dimensional one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%