1978
DOI: 10.1515/znb-1978-1130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N2H4-Koordination an Eisen-Schwefel-Zentren: Synthese und Struktur von [N(C4H9)4]2[μ-N2H4{Fe(S2C6H4)2}2]/N2H4Coordination on Iron Sulfur Centres: Synthesis and Structure of [N(C4H9)4]2[μ-N2H4{Fe(S2C6H4)2}2]

Abstract: Abstract The reactions of N2H4 and N2H4 · H2O respectively, with [N(C4H9)4][Fe(S2C6H4)2] are investigated. With N2H4 · H2O the complex salt [N(C4H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometry about iron is that of a slightly distorted octahedron with the hydride and hydrazine ligands in mutually trans positions. The hydrazine is bound end-on, and the Fe–N distance of 2.0927(11) Å is within the range of those reported for other iron complexes containing end-on bound hydrazine ligands (2.042(3)–2.224(5) Å). , The N–N bond length of 1.4635(17) Å is slightly longer than those reported for other iron–hydrazine complexes (1.432(10)–1.460 Å), including those with side-on or bridging hydrazines, although shorter than the bridging hydrazine ligand in {[PhBP Ph 3 ]Fe} 2 (μ–η 1 :η 1 -N 2 H 4 )(μ–η 2 :η 2 -N 2 H 2 ) (PhBP Ph 3 = PhB(CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 – ) (1.465(3) Å) . One proton on the terminal nitrogen is disordered over two positions at 50% occupancy each.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The geometry about iron is that of a slightly distorted octahedron with the hydride and hydrazine ligands in mutually trans positions. The hydrazine is bound end-on, and the Fe–N distance of 2.0927(11) Å is within the range of those reported for other iron complexes containing end-on bound hydrazine ligands (2.042(3)–2.224(5) Å). , The N–N bond length of 1.4635(17) Å is slightly longer than those reported for other iron–hydrazine complexes (1.432(10)–1.460 Å), including those with side-on or bridging hydrazines, although shorter than the bridging hydrazine ligand in {[PhBP Ph 3 ]Fe} 2 (μ–η 1 :η 1 -N 2 H 4 )(μ–η 2 :η 2 -N 2 H 2 ) (PhBP Ph 3 = PhB(CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 – ) (1.465(3) Å) . One proton on the terminal nitrogen is disordered over two positions at 50% occupancy each.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The cis angles of O−M−O and the N−M−O are from 84.74° to 95.26° in 4·Mn , 84.34° to 95.66° in 5·Co, and all trans angles are 180° (Table ). The N−N bond distance (1.465(5) Å for 4·Mn , 1.464(4) Å for 5·Co ) and the angle of M−N−N (116.7° for 4·Mn , 118.98° for 5·Co ) in the hydrazine bridging ligand are similar to the former ones. , Different from 1 − 3 , the structures of 4 − 6 can be regarded as the hydrazine bridged 1D chain M−N 2 H 4 −M which are connected into 3D framework by sulfate anions (Figure b, c and Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). The hydrazine molecules act as a trans bidentate bridging ligands and link the adjacent M 2+ metal ions into the 1D infinite chains, with the M···M distance 5.08 Å. all these 1D chains are parallel to the ab plane, and run along two directions alternately: the a + b direction and a − b direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Nearly all iron N 2 H 4 complexes contain hydrazine bonded in a terminal [109-120] Á 1 geometry or a bridging [108,116,121] Á 1 geometry. Recently an Á 2 coordination mode was observed using iron-phosphine scaffolds [91,92].…”
Section: Iron Hydrazine (N 2 H 4 ) Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%