2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomaterial interference with early human placenta: Sophisticated matter meets sophisticated tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, studies have shown that even without the addition of targeting modalities, nanoparticles are retained in the placenta without fetal crossover, demonstrating the potential for treatment of placental diseases using NMDD agents -especially in the first trimester of pregnancy when the fetus is most vulnerable to exposure to xenobiotics [94]. However, despite the placenta's unrestricted access to maternal blood-borne drugs, only a relatively small fraction of maternally administered nontargeted nanoparticles are taken up by the placenta.…”
Section: Nanopharmaceuticals That Target the Placentamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed above, studies have shown that even without the addition of targeting modalities, nanoparticles are retained in the placenta without fetal crossover, demonstrating the potential for treatment of placental diseases using NMDD agents -especially in the first trimester of pregnancy when the fetus is most vulnerable to exposure to xenobiotics [94]. However, despite the placenta's unrestricted access to maternal blood-borne drugs, only a relatively small fraction of maternally administered nontargeted nanoparticles are taken up by the placenta.…”
Section: Nanopharmaceuticals That Target the Placentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though some studies have examined the toxicological effects of nanomaterials in pregnancy, and reviewed the methods by which to assess properties of engineered nanomaterials [117,118,119], there is a need for universal guidelines for nanotoxicological assessment in pregnancy. Toxic effects of nanomaterials at the maternal-fetal interface are often ignored and more comprehensive toxicological studies in this area are lacking, as has been stated previously by others in the field [94,120]. This issue is particularly problematic for studies on early pregnancy exposure, where our understanding of developmental toxicology and ability to devise pertinent models for preclinical toxicological studies is very limited [94].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although animal-based studies are a time-consuming and expensive approach, they are still considered the most thorough means of investigating target organ toxicity, particularly for placental toxicity and reproductive toxicity. Female populations are vulnerable and deserve special attention because toxicity can impair female reproduction and fetal development ( Juch et al, 2013;Keelan, 2011). For example, an imbalanced and detrimental effect of TiO 2 nanoparticles was observed in the ovarian cells of mice, including changes in gene expression and in the regulation of the immune system, cell proliferation and many other vital functions of the ovary.…”
Section: Current In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulsen et al, 2015), but even more studies using only a single monolayer of choriocarcinoma cells like BeWo on a crude collagen matrix (e.g. Correia Carreira et al, 2015 or Ali et al, 2013), do not explain much about nano biokinetics in early human gestation (Juch et al, 2013). Especially, the critical period of organogenesis, when severe malformations can be induced, is not represented by such experiments, an essential teratologic issue worth mentioning in the discussions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%