2014
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2013.2283409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanorobotic Testing to Assess the Stiffness Properties of Nanopaper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to X-µCT-based calibration, a theoretical estimate of calibration parameter k according to Equation 15 was calculated using the values of Young's modulus E = 11 ± 1 GPa, Poisson's ratio ν = 0.3 ± 0.1 [23,24], κ = 2, F = 20 N and A 0 = 2 cm 2 leading in k = (1.7 ± 0.2) × 10 −5 . The resulting estimates of intrinsic thickness together with the apparent and reference thickness values are shown in Figure 6b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to X-µCT-based calibration, a theoretical estimate of calibration parameter k according to Equation 15 was calculated using the values of Young's modulus E = 11 ± 1 GPa, Poisson's ratio ν = 0.3 ± 0.1 [23,24], κ = 2, F = 20 N and A 0 = 2 cm 2 leading in k = (1.7 ± 0.2) × 10 −5 . The resulting estimates of intrinsic thickness together with the apparent and reference thickness values are shown in Figure 6b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides above testing methods, for fragile two-dimensional materials, as a nondestructive assessment method, in situ nanoindentation measurements have been employed to examine the mechanical properties of a few-layer graphene membrane [ 36 ], individual graphene flakes [ 37 ] ( Figure 1(e) ), and nanopaper made of microfibrillated cellulose [ 38 ] ( Figure 1(f) ), where characteristic force-displacement curves were recorded during the indentation process to extract the Young's modulus. Also, local stiffness of InP suspended micromembrane was first-time measured by a tuning-fork-based dynamic force sensor inside SEM [ 39 ].…”
Section: In Situ Multiphysical Characterization In Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An InGaAs/GaAs nanospring was stretched for tensile tests using a similar method to determine its stiffness 157,158 (refer to Figure 4c). Figure 4d shows an example of the characterization of 2D nanomaterials, where 2D nanopaper composed of microfibrillated cellulose was fixed on both ends and driven against a capacitive force sensor probe to perform nanoindentation 159 . Figure 4e shows the indentation of a graphene film using a piezoresistive AFM cantilever.…”
Section: Manipulation and Characterization Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%