2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3525806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale probing of dielectric breakdown at SiO2/3C-SiC interfaces

Abstract: Thin (6–7 nm) SiO2 layers were thermally grown onto cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC) heteroepitaxial layers of different surface roughness and with different types of near-surface epitaxial defects. Localized dielectric breakdown (BD) was studied by electrically stressing the system using conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM), which constitutes a means to directly and simultaneously observe localized dielectric failure as a function of stress time and surface morphology with nanoscale lateral resolution. AF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). To explore the electrical behaviour of the TD, a nanoscale electrical characterization was carried out using the conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) [18]. In particular, C-AFM allowed determining the morphological shape of the surface (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b). To explore the electrical behaviour of the TD, a nanoscale electrical characterization was carried out using the conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) [18]. In particular, C-AFM allowed determining the morphological shape of the surface (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, C-AFM allowed determining the morphological shape of the surface (Fig. 4a) -a triangle with the vertex in the [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] direction -about 25 nm deeper than the surface of the JFET region where it is located. Even in the triangular region (highlighted with a dashed line), the surface conductivity is rather homogeneous (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a strong inversion case such as the MOSFET being switched on, ΦB≈∆EC [4]. The theoretical value of ∆EC for 4H-SiC/SiO2 is 2.7 eV and had recently been experimentally reported [15], whereas the value for Si is 3.2 eV, and for 3C-SiC 3.7 eV [16], potentially the most stable among the three. Moreover, the smaller bandgap means most of the traps troubling the 4H-SiC/SiO2 interface are located in the conduction band of 3C-SiC, namely not contributing to degrade the channel mobility, thus lower channel resistance for a MOSFET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding the 3C-SiC/SiO2 interface, some study was performed on the interface trap density [33,34] and channel mobility [29,35,36], whereas very little on the reliability. In [16], dielectric breakdown of very thin (6-7 nm) and small area (100 nm diameter) thermally grown SiO2 on 3C-SiC(111) was studied by Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown (TDDB) test at 10 V (≈15 MV/cm), and Weibull slope β values of 4.4-5.1 were obtained. This is close to the performance of SiO2 layers on Si with similar thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%