2006
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2006.869658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscopic processes of current-induced switching in thin tunnel junctions

Abstract: Abstract-In magnetic nanostructures one usually uses a magnetic field to commute between two resistance (R) states. A less common but technologically more interesting alternative to achieve R-switching is to use an electrical current, preferably of low intensity. Such Current Induced Switching (CIS) was recently observed in thin magnetic tunnel junctions, and attributed to electromigration of atoms into/out of the insulator. Here we study the Current Induced Switching, electrical resistance, and magnetoresista… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature dependent measurements were performed in a closed cycle cryostat down to 20 K. 19,20 Let us define here the relative MTJ-resistance change ͑for parallel and antiparallel states͒ between 300 and 20 K as ␣ P,AP = ͑R 300 K P,AP − R 20 K P,AP ͒ / R 300 K P,AP , so that ␣ Ͻ 0 ͑Ͼ0͒ indicates tunnel-͑metallic-͒ like transport. Temperature dependent measurements were performed in a closed cycle cryostat down to 20 K. 19,20 Let us define here the relative MTJ-resistance change ͑for parallel and antiparallel states͒ between 300 and 20 K as ␣ P,AP = ͑R 300 K P,AP − R 20 K P,AP ͒ / R 300 K P,AP , so that ␣ Ͻ 0 ͑Ͼ0͒ indicates tunnel-͑metallic-͒ like transport.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature dependent measurements were performed in a closed cycle cryostat down to 20 K. 19,20 Let us define here the relative MTJ-resistance change ͑for parallel and antiparallel states͒ between 300 and 20 K as ␣ P,AP = ͑R 300 K P,AP − R 20 K P,AP ͒ / R 300 K P,AP , so that ␣ Ͻ 0 ͑Ͼ0͒ indicates tunnel-͑metallic-͒ like transport. Temperature dependent measurements were performed in a closed cycle cryostat down to 20 K. 19,20 Let us define here the relative MTJ-resistance change ͑for parallel and antiparallel states͒ between 300 and 20 K as ␣ P,AP = ͑R 300 K P,AP − R 20 K P,AP ͒ / R 300 K P,AP , so that ␣ Ͻ 0 ͑Ͼ0͒ indicates tunnel-͑metallic-͒ like transport.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case breakdown (at |I| ≈ 35 mA), leads to a slight and gradual R (and TMR; not shown) decrease. This behavior is related with defect-driven extrinsic breakdown of the barrier reflecting the growth of existing pinholes [5], [6] likely through thermally assisted electromigration of metallic ions from the electrodes into the barrier [14], [15]. Three more breakdown events are visible at higher currents (|I| ≈ 50 mA, ≈ 65 mA and ≈ 80 mA), further reducing R and bringing TMR to zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Returning to the CIS(I p ) cycle of figure 1(b), high positive current pulses induce ionic EM in the reverse direction, switching the tunnel junction resistance [35] into the previous intermediate resistance state (B). This shows virtual reversibility of the EM effects induced by comparable magnitude positive and negative current pulses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%