1992
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(92)90202-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosphere and microsphere uptake via Peyer's patches: observation of the rate of uptake in the rat after a single oral dose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms of oral uptake include diffusion of particles through mucus and accessibility to enterocyte surface, epithelial interaction, cellular trafficking, exocytosis and systemic dissemination (Hou et al, 2009). Nanoparticles are preferentially absorbed via "M-cells" in the Peyer''s patches by the process of endocytosis (lymphoid uptake), thereby delivering the drug loaded particles directly into systemic circulation through the lymphatics and circumventing the firstpass metabolism (Jani et al, 1992;Desai et al, 1996). Lymphatic uptake is influenced by lipid nature, chain length, and hydrophobicity of nanoparticles (Hussain et al, 2001;Nordskog et al, 2001).…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of oral uptake include diffusion of particles through mucus and accessibility to enterocyte surface, epithelial interaction, cellular trafficking, exocytosis and systemic dissemination (Hou et al, 2009). Nanoparticles are preferentially absorbed via "M-cells" in the Peyer''s patches by the process of endocytosis (lymphoid uptake), thereby delivering the drug loaded particles directly into systemic circulation through the lymphatics and circumventing the firstpass metabolism (Jani et al, 1992;Desai et al, 1996). Lymphatic uptake is influenced by lipid nature, chain length, and hydrophobicity of nanoparticles (Hussain et al, 2001;Nordskog et al, 2001).…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally known that nanoparticles are better absorbed than microparticles. 55 For instance, according to Desai et al, 56 100 nm nanoparticles in rats were 15-to 250-fold better absorbed than 500 nm and 10 µm particles, respectively. Nevertheless, many reports describe that both APCs and PP M-cells are able to internalize particles up to 10 µm through phagocytosis or macropinocytosis.…”
Section: Vaccine Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the several physical properties of nanoparticles for their influence on absorption and distribution, particle size would be one of the most important factors in determining the kinetics and distribution upon administration into the body. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] For example, Florence et al reported that polystyrene particles with a smaller diameter of 50 and 100 nm could be easily absorbed through Peyer's patches and villi of the GI tract in comparison with larger particles with diameters of 300 and 3,000 nm. 26,27 The distribution of nanoparticles in the liver may be due to the fact that the liver possesses many sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells, and it is the major organ for removing circulating foreign materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%