Nasomaxillary fracture: Retrospective review of 11 consecutive patients and literature review

Adnot, Jérôme; Desbarats, C.; Joly, Luc‐Marie; Trost, O.

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.03.003

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Facial fracture sites have been reported to be accessed through a circular incision, which is found in coronal, intraoral, eyebrow, and subcilial incisions, and transconjunctival approaches. 5 , 6 , 9 In the authors’ case, because the orbital rim needed to be fixed, transconjunctival and intraoral approaches were selected. A transconjunctival incision allows surgeons not only to access the fracture site but also to minimize scarring.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the transconjunctival approach could not provide a sufficient visual field, the surgical maneuver was expected to be difficult, and this study also used an intraoral approach for performing the reduction of nasomaxillary fractures. 9 In fixing the facial bones, Yoshioka reported that the infraorbital and piriform rims of the fracture are fixed with absorbable plates. 6 In the present case, absorbable plates were used because the patient was young, and absorbable plates have no risk of developing long-term complications due to foreign matters, requiring no further surgery for removing the pins.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Three-dimensionally Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Model for the Reduction of Nasomaxillary Fracture

Ikebe

Niimi

Hasegawa

et al. 2021

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary: The successful reduction of a nasomaxillary fracture was performed using a three-dimensional printed model. A 16-year-old boy was struck in the left orbit by a baseball; subsequently, he was diagnosed with the nasal bone fracture at a hospital, and was referred to the authors’ department. A left nasomaxillary fracture and nasal bone fracture were diagnosed by computed tomography. Standard triangulated language data for the mirror image of the frontal process of the right maxilla were obtained from digital imaging and communications in medicine data for preparing a three-dimensional printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene model. On postinjury day 13, the frontal process fracture was reduced via transconjunctival and intraoral approaches. After the reduction of the fracture, an absorbable plate fitting to the shape of three-dimensional printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene model was molded, and the maxillary frontal process and infraorbital rim were reduced and fixed with an absorbable plate and screws. Postoperative computed tomography demonstrated a favorable reduction. The intraoperative use of the 3D printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene model was helpful in the nasomaxillary fracture reduction and fixation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Three-dimensionally Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Model for the Reduction of Nasomaxillary Fracture

Ikebe

Niimi

Hasegawa

et al. 2021

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This area offers a cortical bone suitable for the anchorage and functional load of osseointegrated implants. However, there are few implant-oriented anatomical studies and some are anthropometric studies [13][14][15][16].…”

Section: Nasomaxillary Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Using Osseointegrated Implants in Oncological Patients: Buttress Implant Concept

Díez-Suárez¹,

González-Cardín²,

Gómez‐Pedraza³

et al. 2021

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cancer leaves important consequences in the shape, function and esthetics of the patient, especially when it is cancer of the oral cavity or upper aero-digestive tract. Although reconstruction with local and microvascular flaps is sometimes a viable option, maxillofacial rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants is a well-reported treatment alternative with a high success rate. The main advantages in this modality of rehabilitation are the decrease in biological and economic costs, simplifying the management of these defects by reducing surgical intervention, hospitalization time, postoperative morbidity and treatment time. There are several classification systems; however, there is no classification system that has accurately described the maxillofacial defect under a surgical, prosthetic and reconstructive approach with osseointegrated implants. The purpose of this study is to guide professionals in decision-making for maxillofacial rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants located in the anatomical buttresses of the maxillofacial region.

show abstract

Imaging of Midfacial and Orbital Trauma

Kirsch

2021

Atlas of Emergency Imaging From Head-to-Toe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nasomaxillary fracture: Retrospective review of 11 consecutive patients and literature review

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

A Three-dimensionally Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Model for the Reduction of Nasomaxillary Fracture

A Three-dimensionally Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Model for the Reduction of Nasomaxillary Fracture

A Review of Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Using Osseointegrated Implants in Oncological Patients: Buttress Implant Concept

Imaging of Midfacial and Orbital Trauma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About