National Styles of NGO Regulation

Abstract

Why do Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries vary in their regulatory approach toward nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)? This article introduces an index to assess NGO regulation regarding barriers to entry, NGOs’ political capacity, and economic activity. Our cross-section analysis of 28 OECD countries offers preliminary evidence of systematic differences in NGO regulation between corporatist and pluralist systems. We suggest corporatist systems have more restrictive regulations because NGOs risk upsetting the political order and managed social consensus. In pluralist countries, NGOs face fewer restrictions because governments view them as substitutes for formal communication channels. We present two cases, Japan (corporatist) and the United States (pluralist), to illustrate this argument. In sum, macroinstitutional arrangements of political representation have a crucial bearing on national styles of NGO regulation. Future uses of this index include examining the effects of national context on international NGOs (INGOs), explaining variations in organizational structures and strategies among NGOs, and tracking variations in NGO–state relations over time.

Civil Society Organizations in a Post‐Aid World: New Trends and Observations from the Andean Region

“…In addition, government funding for CSOs in the region might be tempered by increasingly restrictive policies, which influence barriers to entry, limitations in political engagement, and restrictions related to economic activates for CSOs (Bloodgood et al, ). Recent research on restrictive policies in the Andean region found that Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru have all experienced the implementation of policies which are perceived by CSOs as weakening civil society spaces and funding sources (Appe and Barragán, forthcoming b ).…”

Internal, Interactive, and Institutional Factors: A Unified Framework for Understanding International Nongovernmental Organizations

“…This may be due to obstacles stemming from additional internal factors, such as the staff's demographics, experiences, or training. It also could be due to obstacles in the non-governmental organization's institutional environment (Bloodgood, Tremblay-Boire, and Prakash 2014) or its interactions with states, IGOs, donors, and other actors (Carpenter 2014). The book does not specify when an organization's managerial structure will provide it enough power to overcome constraints in the overall institutional environment.…”

Shifting the Development Discourse: A Narrative of a Civil Society Network in Ecuador

“…The regulation of organizations centres on processes of legalization, rules related to political activity and oversight on financial resources (Bloodgood et al ., ). Organized civil society in Ecuador has sought to shift from a reliance on government regulation to sector‐level self‐regulation.…”