2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2004.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native 10Gigabit Ethernet experiments over long distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Packet loss rate is not negligible. As pointed out by [14], the packet loss occurred when the background traffic increased above 80% of the line speed. As shown in figure 8, nearly all TCP variants perform poorly on high loss rate links.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Tcp Variantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Packet loss rate is not negligible. As pointed out by [14], the packet loss occurred when the background traffic increased above 80% of the line speed. As shown in figure 8, nearly all TCP variants perform poorly on high loss rate links.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Tcp Variantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…But their main purpose is to maximize the performance of 10 Gigabit ethernet adapter and analyze the possible bottlenecks. Meirosu et al [14] presented the throughput of single TCP stream with (and without) background traffic and parallel TCP streams on a trans-European 10 Gigabit ethernet. The aim of the test was to validate that the 10 Gigabit ethernet Wide Area Networks (WANs) PHY technology can offer a large bandwidth to long-distance large volume data transfer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the protocol of 10 GE WAN PHY, the repetition rate of each Ethernet packet can vary with up to ± 20 ppm of the nominal transmission rate, i.e. ± 200 kHz frequency offset between transmitter and receiver must be tolerated [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example: the 10 GE WAN PHY [2] can vary with up to ± 20 ppm of the nominal transmission rate, i.e. ± 200 kHz frequency offset between transmitter and receiver must be tolerated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%