2004
DOI: 10.1080/0964400042000229972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naturalised citizens as voters: behaviour and impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only exception is the EU‐immigrants, whose voting behaviors are similar to those of Belgian natives. A similar pattern can be observed among immigrants in Germany, where naturalized citizens of Turkish descent clearly favor Left parties (the Social Democrats in particular), and immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe prefer the Christian Democrats (Wüst , 351).…”
Section: A Socio‐psychological Explanation Of the Voting Behavior Of supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only exception is the EU‐immigrants, whose voting behaviors are similar to those of Belgian natives. A similar pattern can be observed among immigrants in Germany, where naturalized citizens of Turkish descent clearly favor Left parties (the Social Democrats in particular), and immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe prefer the Christian Democrats (Wüst , 351).…”
Section: A Socio‐psychological Explanation Of the Voting Behavior Of supporting
confidence: 58%
“…This argument rests on the assumption that electoral choices are strongly economically determined. However, as Wüest () has shown for Germany, socio‐economic characteristics are of some importance for the explanation of immigrant voting but do not tell the entire story. The same has been observed in France, where social stratification alone cannot explain why Maghrebians and African‐French strongly lean Left (Tiberj ).…”
Section: A Socio‐psychological Explanation Of the Voting Behavior Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 While Germany's party system -along with several other West European party systems -has instead been structured by the religious and class cleavages, 19 immigration and increased cultural diversity can be considered having reactivated the 'old' cultural cleavage with different connotations in the second half of the twentieth century. 20 Parties of the political Left have taken a position of general support of immigrants and minorities while the centre-right parties have been restrictive, except for the ethnically based immigration and integration of German resettlers that have left Eastern Europe. 21 If we extract categories of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP) which can be considered migration-related, 22 the expected left -right pattern is only partially visible (Table 1).…”
Section: Party Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In addition, I control for whether respondent is Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or belongs to some other non-Christian group. While for Christians a suitable political choice may be a socially conservative right-wing party, the growing divide between Islam and Christianity in contemporary democracies implies that Muslims may be more comfortable developing links with secular political parties than with parties that are explicitly Christian (Wüst, 2004).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%