2017
DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2017.1386792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Navigating Difficult Times with Pillow Talk: Post Sex Communication as a Strategy for Mitigating Uncertainty Following Relational Transgressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding may be a product of the perceptions of the highly affectionate, but it may also suggest that giving affection promotes receiving affection, which may ultimately contribute to relational longevity. Indeed, affectionate communication in the context of sexual activity (e.g., postsex communication, or “pillow talk”; Denes, , ) has been linked to relational maintenance (Denes, Dhillon, & Speer, ) and has been used as a tool for repairing relationships following transgressions (Denes, Crowley, Makos, Whitt, & Graham, in press). Taken together, such findings suggest that individuals may give affection in an effort to promote well‐being in their relationships, even when the relationship is not doing well.…”
Section: Affectionate Communication and Interpersonal Acceptance–rejementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may be a product of the perceptions of the highly affectionate, but it may also suggest that giving affection promotes receiving affection, which may ultimately contribute to relational longevity. Indeed, affectionate communication in the context of sexual activity (e.g., postsex communication, or “pillow talk”; Denes, , ) has been linked to relational maintenance (Denes, Dhillon, & Speer, ) and has been used as a tool for repairing relationships following transgressions (Denes, Crowley, Makos, Whitt, & Graham, in press). Taken together, such findings suggest that individuals may give affection in an effort to promote well‐being in their relationships, even when the relationship is not doing well.…”
Section: Affectionate Communication and Interpersonal Acceptance–rejementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research often examines the Stafford and Canary maintenance factors as noted above. However, imagined interactions (Van Kelegom & Wright, 2013), relational continuity construction units (Ellis & Ledbetter, 2015) and pillow talk (Denes et al, 2018) have been examined. Maintenance behaviors have also been proposed as a means of managing uncertainty (Denes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Reflecting On the Past: What Maintenance Research Has Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, imagined interactions (Van Kelegom & Wright, 2013), relational continuity construction units (Ellis & Ledbetter, 2015) and pillow talk (Denes et al, 2018) have been examined. Maintenance behaviors have also been proposed as a means of managing uncertainty (Denes et al, 2018). Regardless of direction, findings indicate negative links between uncertainty and positive maintenance behaviors (e.g., assurances) and positive links between uncertainty and negative maintenance (jealousy evocation).…”
Section: Reflecting On the Past: What Maintenance Research Has Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%