2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja022550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near‐Earth heliospheric magnetic field intensity since 1750: 2. Cosmogenic radionuclide reconstructions

Abstract: This is Part 2 of a study of the near‐Earth heliospheric magnetic field strength, B, since 1750. Part 1 produced composite estimates of B from geomagnetic and sunspot data over the period 1750–2013. Sunspot‐based reconstructions can be extended back to 1610, but the paleocosmic ray (PCR) record is the only data set capable of providing a record of solar activity on millennial timescales. The process for converting 10Be concentrations measured in ice cores to B is more complex than with geomagnetic and sunspot … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, there are independent tests that can be applied for most of interval A, provided by the cosmogenic isotopes 14 C (found in tree trunks), 10 Be (in ice sheets) and 44 Ti (in meteorites). Tests using all 3 of these show that the reconstructed OSF predicts well with the variation of their abundances back to, and during, the Maunder minimum (Lockwood, 2001(Lockwood, , 2003Usoskin et al, 2015;Owens et al, 2016b;Asvestari & Usoskin, 2016;Asvestari et al, 2017). Initially these tests used simple linear regressions of OSF and the cosmogenic isotope abundances but, more recently, have evolved to employ relationships between the two based on the physics of cosmic ray shielding by the heliospheric field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there are independent tests that can be applied for most of interval A, provided by the cosmogenic isotopes 14 C (found in tree trunks), 10 Be (in ice sheets) and 44 Ti (in meteorites). Tests using all 3 of these show that the reconstructed OSF predicts well with the variation of their abundances back to, and during, the Maunder minimum (Lockwood, 2001(Lockwood, , 2003Usoskin et al, 2015;Owens et al, 2016b;Asvestari & Usoskin, 2016;Asvestari et al, 2017). Initially these tests used simple linear regressions of OSF and the cosmogenic isotope abundances but, more recently, have evolved to employ relationships between the two based on the physics of cosmic ray shielding by the heliospheric field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we have compared the in situ observations of solar wind with geomagnetic observations and sunspot time series to infer the solar wind magnetic field strength from 1750 to 2013. In the companion paper [ Owens et al , ] we compare these geomagnetic‐ and sunspot‐based time series for B with corresponding time series based on the cosmogenic radionuclide record. All composite time series are provided in the supporting information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we use the sunspot and geomagnetic data sets to consolidate and extend the time series for near‐Earth heliospheric magnetic field (HMF) intensity, B , back to 1750. In the companion paper [ Owens et al , ], we compare the two B series derived here (geomagnetic‐based and sunspot‐based) with the B series based on cosmogenic radionuclide data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19) as well as geomagnetic and heliospheric proxies (Lockwood et al 2016a, b) favor the 'lower' reconstructions (Hoyt and Schatten 1998;Usoskin et al 2016b) against the 'high' reconstructions (Svalgaard and Schatten 2016). On the other hand, comparison with the solar open magnetic field models (Owens et al 2016) cannot distinguish between different series.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%