1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0037062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negro vs Caucasian psychological test performance revisited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1975
1975
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that even after carefully matching Hispanics and Whites for age, education, and psychiatric diagnosis, MMPI differences between Hispanics and Whites are not minimized or eliminated. In fact, these results argue against the longstanding notion that Hispanics and Blacks respond similarly to the MMPI because of a "shared minority status" or because of similar sociocultural characteristics (Davis & Jones, 1974), or that Hispanics differ from Whites in a manner similar to that in which Blacks differ from Whites. More importantly, these findings indicate that researchers and clinicians should not assume that previous MMPI findings on African Americans or other ethnic groups (e.g., Asian or Native Americans) are equally applicable to Hispanics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The results suggest that even after carefully matching Hispanics and Whites for age, education, and psychiatric diagnosis, MMPI differences between Hispanics and Whites are not minimized or eliminated. In fact, these results argue against the longstanding notion that Hispanics and Blacks respond similarly to the MMPI because of a "shared minority status" or because of similar sociocultural characteristics (Davis & Jones, 1974), or that Hispanics differ from Whites in a manner similar to that in which Blacks differ from Whites. More importantly, these findings indicate that researchers and clinicians should not assume that previous MMPI findings on African Americans or other ethnic groups (e.g., Asian or Native Americans) are equally applicable to Hispanics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Separate discriminant analyses for White and Black patients, with the criterion of either anger or psychosis, were performed. The 14 predictors were the 11 MCMI personality scales and 3 other subject variables-age, intelligence, and years of educationthat were included because of past reported significant relations in objective assessment of psychopathology (Davis & Jones, 1974;Hyer, Harkey, & Harrison, 1986; Watson, Davis, & McDermott, 1976). The criterion of anger or psychotic symptoms was dichotomized, so that patients who reported no symptoms were assigned to one group, and patients who reported any symptoms were assigned to the other.…”
Section: Prediction Of White and Black Patients' Anger And Psychosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less educated blacks were considered deviant enough in their RlMPI responses to render their clinical profiles of questionable validity. The implication of these studies is that the M M P I loses discriminative power among black respondents, especially those with less than 12 years of education (3).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%