2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
174
2
41

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
15
174
2
41
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of a phenol ring in the monomer chain of UDMA leads to greater flexibility and toughness when compared with Bis-GMA, making the UDMA resins more reactive, with higher conversion and cross-link density than are associated with the Bis-GMA polymers, contributing to the matrix being more resistant to abrasion. 36 Based on the results of this current study, the hypothesis that a nanofilled RMGI subjected to a pH-cycling model prior to a three-body abrasion test would not differ in surface roughness and micromorphology from a conventional GI, RMGI, and nanofilled resin composite was rejected. Ketac N100 showed statistically significant intermediate roughness values between GI and a nanocomposite resin after pH cycling and toothbrushing abrasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of a phenol ring in the monomer chain of UDMA leads to greater flexibility and toughness when compared with Bis-GMA, making the UDMA resins more reactive, with higher conversion and cross-link density than are associated with the Bis-GMA polymers, contributing to the matrix being more resistant to abrasion. 36 Based on the results of this current study, the hypothesis that a nanofilled RMGI subjected to a pH-cycling model prior to a three-body abrasion test would not differ in surface roughness and micromorphology from a conventional GI, RMGI, and nanofilled resin composite was rejected. Ketac N100 showed statistically significant intermediate roughness values between GI and a nanocomposite resin after pH cycling and toothbrushing abrasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Filtek Supreme nanocomposite presents nanofillers and nanoclusters and the resin matrix had other resin monomers, such as the ethoxylated version of Bis-GMA (Bis-EMA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UD-MA). 36 Thus, Ketac N100 had an intermediate composition between RMGIs and nanocomposites, presenting intermediate superficial characteristics and abrasion resistance. Ketac N100 presented an appearance more like a polyacid-modified resin composite based on resin components and structure; however, further studies must be conducted to investigate this fact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all these data it is possible to plot a graph of Degree Conversion vs. Time. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] …”
Section: Mid Infrared Spectroscopy (Mir)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bond strength between the original material and newly added resin is dependent on unreacted C=C double bonds [25]. The resins often have incomplete C=C double-bond conversion after being polymerized [37]. As the material ages, more cross-linking decreases the capability of fresh monomer to infiltrate into the matrix, and fewer and fewer unreacted C=C double bonds remain [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%