2010
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181be9c7e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromuscular Performance of Explosive Power Athletes versus Untrained Individuals

Abstract: The differences in voluntary normalized RFD between athletes and controls were explained by agonist muscle neural activation and not by the similar intrinsic contractile properties of the groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
279
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
17
279
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak isometric knee extension torque was identified as the highest of the angle-specific peak torques. The rate of torque development trial at the angle corresponding to peak isometric torque was used to obtain the rate of change of joint torque in 50 ms intervals (RTD 0-50 , RTD 50-100 , RTD 100-150 ) from 0-150 ms after the onset of contraction (identified manually; Tillin, Jimenez-Reyes, Pain, & Folland, 2010). This enabled the investigation of the earlier agonist neural drive dominated and later maximal voluntary torque dominated rate of torque development (Andersen & Aagaard, 2006;Tillin, Pain, & Folland, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak isometric knee extension torque was identified as the highest of the angle-specific peak torques. The rate of torque development trial at the angle corresponding to peak isometric torque was used to obtain the rate of change of joint torque in 50 ms intervals (RTD 0-50 , RTD 50-100 , RTD 100-150 ) from 0-150 ms after the onset of contraction (identified manually; Tillin, Jimenez-Reyes, Pain, & Folland, 2010). This enabled the investigation of the earlier agonist neural drive dominated and later maximal voluntary torque dominated rate of torque development (Andersen & Aagaard, 2006;Tillin, Pain, & Folland, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Electrical stimulation Using previously published methods [3,18], the femoral nerve was electrically stimulated (DS7AH, Digitimer Ltd., UK) with square wave pulses (0.1 ms duration) while participants were voluntarily passive to elicit explosive octet contractions (via eight pulses at 300 Hz) and compound muscle action potentials (M-waves; via a single pulse). At a knee angle of 1018, a series of single pulses were elicited at incremental current intensities until a maximal current intensity (simultaneous plateau in torque and M-wave response of each muscle) was achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During 240 explosive contractions, the sEMG RMS from all muscles was determined in time 241 periods of 0-50, 50-100 and 100-150 ms, from the onset of sEMG activity in the first 242 agonist muscle to be activated. As with the onset of force, agonist sEMG onset was 243 identified manually (Tillin et al 2010), with the y-and x-axis scales set at 100 mV 244 and 500 ms, respectively. The vertical cursor was placed on the onset and the scale 245 was reduced to 50 mV and 25 ms for the y-and x-axis, respectively, to confirm the 246 exact location of sEMG onset, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%