Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and primary motor cortex (MI) have been compared in many experiments during performance of many different motor tasks. On one hand, the activity in both areas may appear similar, especially when the motor task is simple. On the other hand, if the motor tasks are more demanding, neuronal activity in the SMA exhibits a variety of complex relationship to many different aspects of motor behavior, while the activity in MI is mostly related to execution of motor task itself. Of particular interest is the neuronal activity in the SMA during preparation and execution of motor tasks when no external cues for the retrieval of appropriate motor act is available. Temporal sequencing of multiple movements is a typical example of the kind of motor task that requires profound activity in the SMA.Keywords: Supplementary motor area (SMA); Primary motor cortex (MI); Pre-SMA; Motor preparation; Motor sequence; Subhuman primate
New concepts of motor areas in the medial frontal cortexUntil recently, only one motor representation area was known to exist in the medial part of the frontal lobe, as described in classical reports [55,80]. However, it is now proposed that at least four somatomotor fields and one oculomotor field exist in the medial frontal cortex. [65]. Traditionally, the supplementary motor area (SMA) has been defined as a single motor area in the frontal agranular cortex, corresponding to medial part of Brodmann's area 6. However, some indications for possible existence of heterogeneity in this region has been obtained [2,15,25,42]. On the basis of cytoarchitectonic analysis combined with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry and detailed ICMS studies, Rizzolatti and coworkers proposed a view that two motor areas exist in the region of the cortex traditionally defined as the SMA [41,44]. They termed the rostral and caudal areas as F6 and F3, largely corresponding to 6ab and 6aa of Vogts [78]. They also reported the existence of neuronal activity characteristic in mesial 6ab, namely, the activity during arm reaching-grasping movements [57]. Systematic attempts were made in our laboratory to determine whether it is possible to define two different areas unequivocally by a battery of physiological tests [45]. By implanting electrodes into the forelimb area of the MI, we found that field and unitary responses to electrical stimulation were distinct in the caudal part of mesial area 6, but not in the rostral part. The caudal part was distinctly more microexcitable by the ICMS than the rostral part. Neuronal responses to visual stimuli prevailed in the rostral part, but somatosensory responses were rare. The opposite was true in the caudal part [24,79]. Furthermore, single-unit activity during performance of a trained motor task was quantitatively analyzed and compared in the same individuals. Phasic responses to visual cue signals indicating the direction of forthcoming arm-reaching movement were more abundant in the rostral part. Neuronal activity changes during th...