1991
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal activity in the primate premotor, supplementary, and precentral motor cortex during visually guided and internally determined sequential movements

Abstract: 1. Single-cell activity was recorded from three different motor areas in the cerebral cortex: the primary motor cortex (MI), supplementary motor area (SMA), and premotor cortex (PM). 2. Three monkeys (Macaca fuscata) were trained to perform a sequential motor task in two different conditions. In one condition (visually triggered task, VT), they reached to and touched three pads placed in a front panel by following lights illuminated individually from behind the pads. In the other condition (internally guided t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
291
4
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
27
291
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to habitual (internally cued) speech, measures of speech function and intelligibility improve when PD subjects are prompted (externally cued) to speak more loudly, clearly, or slowly (Dromey & Ramig, 1998; Ho, Bradshaw, Iansek, & Alfredson, 1999; Sapir, 2014; Tjaden, Sussman, & Wilding, 2014). As motor preparatory activity in PMd is biased toward the planning and execution of movements that are externally cued (Halsband, Matsuzaka, & Tanji, 1994; Halsband & Passingham, 1982; Lu, Arai, Tsai, & Ziemann, 2012; Mushiake, Inase, & Tanji, 1991), increased connectivity with GPi could reflect a mechanism for compensatory reliance on external cues during speech production in PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to habitual (internally cued) speech, measures of speech function and intelligibility improve when PD subjects are prompted (externally cued) to speak more loudly, clearly, or slowly (Dromey & Ramig, 1998; Ho, Bradshaw, Iansek, & Alfredson, 1999; Sapir, 2014; Tjaden, Sussman, & Wilding, 2014). As motor preparatory activity in PMd is biased toward the planning and execution of movements that are externally cued (Halsband, Matsuzaka, & Tanji, 1994; Halsband & Passingham, 1982; Lu, Arai, Tsai, & Ziemann, 2012; Mushiake, Inase, & Tanji, 1991), increased connectivity with GPi could reflect a mechanism for compensatory reliance on external cues during speech production in PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is supported by studies of reaching arm movements, another behavior in which DMFC is involved. Mushiake et al (1991) recorded from DMFC neurons during visually-guided reaches or remembered sequences of reaches and found preferential modulation during the latter. Also, Tanji and Shima (1994) reported that many DMFC neurons fire only for arm movements that occur at a particular point in a sequence and not for identical movements that occur singly or at other points in the sequence.…”
Section: Double-step Taskmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the second report [71], SMA neurons were found to be differentially active depending on whether the animal were prepared to move a single hand or both hands. In the third report [50], a group of SMA neurons exhibited selective activity depending upon whether the monkeys were prepared to perform sequential button-press movement under visual guidance or based on memorized information. Thus, the SMA seem to be more involved in preparatory processes than the MI, during a number of different behavioral paradigm.…”
Section: Relation To Motor Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%