1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.1.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Yield ofCf252Based on Absolute Measurements of the Neutron Rate and Fission Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar analyses of the reported measurements were carried out for 1 8 2 Ta and 1 8 3 Ta sin~e new precise values were available for these isotopes. Values for 23 lines from 14 other isotopes were also tallied without least-squares fits to the level scheme.…”
Section: Line Specificationsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar analyses of the reported measurements were carried out for 1 8 2 Ta and 1 8 3 Ta sin~e new precise values were available for these isotopes. Values for 23 lines from 14 other isotopes were also tallied without least-squares fits to the level scheme.…”
Section: Line Specificationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Possible peaks at 334 and 585 keV were observed in the y-ray spectrum in ceincidence with the 585-keV gate and are tentatively placed feeding the 585-keV level{ 1 )The existence of 137-keV y ray as reported and plat.ed by Horen et al is confirmed. The y ray at 563 keV which was previously reportedlby Kucarova et al (3) but not placed in their proposed decay scheme has been confirmed-anr-placed in the proposed decay scheme on the basis of( 2 ) coincide9ce information. • The existence of reported y rays at 323 and 508~ J keV could not be verified.…”
Section: Ntutl P Anderson Mesonmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yield of NBS-I1 was taken to be (1.1729 & 0.3 per cent) x lo6 neutrons/sec as of that date. This yield is the mean of three precision measurements listed (DE VOLPI and PORGES, 1969;DE VOLPI and PORGES, 1970) weighted by the reciprocal of the square of their listed error and corrected for decay to June 1970. Stated error is the internal error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%