2003
DOI: 10.7146/brics.v10i30.21798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Algorithms for Exact Satisfiability

Abstract: The Exact Satisfiability problem is to determine if a CNFformula has a truth assignment satisfying exactly one literal in each clause; Exact 3-Satisfiability is the version in which each clause contains at most three literals. In this paper, we present algorithms for Exact Satisfiability and Exact 3-Satisfiability running in time O(2 0.2325n ) and O(2 0.1379n ), respectively. The previously best algorithms have running times O(2 0.2441n ) for Exact Satisfiability (Monien, Speckenmeyer and Vornberger (1981)) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feder and Motwani [18] give a randomised linear space algorithm with running time O((χ/e) n ) (with high probability), and the running time of a recent algorithm by Angelsmark and Thapper [1] can be given as O((2 + log χ) n ), an asymptotic improvement over Christofides' result for all values of χ . Prior to the current paper, no polynomial space algorithm with running time O(c n ) was known for any constant c, an open problem observed in [6,28]. We provide two such algorithms, based on divide-and-conquer in time O (8.33 n …”
Section: Tsp and Colouringmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Feder and Motwani [18] give a randomised linear space algorithm with running time O((χ/e) n ) (with high probability), and the running time of a recent algorithm by Angelsmark and Thapper [1] can be given as O((2 + log χ) n ), an asymptotic improvement over Christofides' result for all values of χ . Prior to the current paper, no polynomial space algorithm with running time O(c n ) was known for any constant c, an open problem observed in [6,28]. We provide two such algorithms, based on divide-and-conquer in time O (8.33 n …”
Section: Tsp and Colouringmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the two ideas used are far from new, their combination demonstrates a candidate for obtaining competitive upper bounds for some set cover problems other than through analyzing branch and bound algorithms like in [7,12,16,30]. Furthermore, the hard cases of the analysis in #XSAT in [12] and in Minimum Dominating Set in [16] are those when all sets are rather small.…”
Section: Low Pathwidthmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…time). The best known algorithm for Exact Satisfiability (no limit on clause length) has a running time of poly(L) · 2 0.2325n [2]. This algorithm (or a variant thereof) also gives a time bound in the number of literals, but no good time bound in the number of clauses is known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Various exact algorithms have been given for this problem [7,2]. So far all algorithms given for XSAT have been analysed using the number of variables as parameter (in the exponentially growing part of the running E-mail address: bolette@brics.dk (B.A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%