2008
DOI: 10.2528/pier08100404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Anti-Arm Technique by Using Random Phase and Amplitude Active Decoys

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a new method to counter Anti Radiation Missile (ARM) threats, which is effective against advanced ARM. By using random phase and amplitude active decoys in the specified optimum positions and network implementation we show that ARM threats will be removed profoundly. Also, iterative methods are presented to cancel the internal interference effects in the proposed structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the moment of explosion splinters of the missile exploding a few meters above the ground will hit the armor, leaving the antenna protected, regardless of its type. The antenna can be protected by means of lighter materials (Kevlar, composites with ceramic antiballistic layers, reactive armor, armors of the Chobham type 6 ). The best solution would be ultimately to hide the antenna inside the armored vehicle so that the antenna armor itself would shield it from above.…”
Section: Active Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the moment of explosion splinters of the missile exploding a few meters above the ground will hit the armor, leaving the antenna protected, regardless of its type. The antenna can be protected by means of lighter materials (Kevlar, composites with ceramic antiballistic layers, reactive armor, armors of the Chobham type 6 ). The best solution would be ultimately to hide the antenna inside the armored vehicle so that the antenna armor itself would shield it from above.…”
Section: Active Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is better to sacrifice a single decoy instead of the radar, the best outcome is the one where both survive. In studies related to the usage of decoys (e.g., Emadi et al 2008;Shi, Li, and Yuan 2006;Zhou et al 2011), the locations of the decoys are usually assumed to be known or there are few possible locations but the decoys are not assigned to the locations in an optimal way. As the locations may considerably affect the outcome of survival, there is a need for an approach for determining the best possible locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%