2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New data on buried archaeological ruins in Messina area (Sicily-Italy) from a ground penetrating radar survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of modern buildings makes it difficult to perform archaeological excavations in the town area. In fact, despite the presence of several potential archaeological sites in the subsoil of Messina, archaeological excavations are still limited (Imposa et al, 2018). Archaeobotanical remains dated to the Bronze Age were found during archaeological excavations in the Aeolian Archipelago (NE Sicily), testify to the early occupation of the islands near the Peloro Cape, while on mainland Sicily such evidence is still scarce (Mercuri et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of modern buildings makes it difficult to perform archaeological excavations in the town area. In fact, despite the presence of several potential archaeological sites in the subsoil of Messina, archaeological excavations are still limited (Imposa et al, 2018). Archaeobotanical remains dated to the Bronze Age were found during archaeological excavations in the Aeolian Archipelago (NE Sicily), testify to the early occupation of the islands near the Peloro Cape, while on mainland Sicily such evidence is still scarce (Mercuri et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the importance of the analysis of the soil behaviour to the assessment of the whole built heritage system should not be neglected [ 3 ]. Nowadays, geophysical survey techniques are widely used as a strategic tool to characterise the soil and identify and investigate underground evidence, as for instance archaeological remains or even structural elements of the building [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. The widespread use of these methods of investigation is linked to their non-invasive character, their aptitude to be applied to different contexts, especially in urban areas and, in some applications, and the possibility of exploiting the ambient noise originated by natural (e.g., micro tremors, marine waves, wind, meteorological conditions) or anthropic (e.g., human activities, traffic, industrial machinery) sources of vibration [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical prospecting is considered a very important tool in support the archaeological research given its noninvasiveness, speed of execution, and the continuous technological progress of instrumentation. Different geophysical survey methodologies adopted in archaeology over the past 60 years, such as the electrical resistivity technique [1,2], groundpenetrating radar (GPR) [3][4][5], electromagnetic method [6,7], and magnetism [8], can be used to correctly map the position and geometry of buried remains, enabling accurate archaeological excavations [3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Usually, the materials of buried archaeological finds generate contrasts with the surrounding soil due to differences in physical and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%