2001
DOI: 10.1029/01eo00190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New digital data base helps to map North America

Abstract: A new effort is underway to compile an upgraded digital magnetic anomaly data base and map for the North American continent by 2002. This program is a joint effort by the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and Consejo de Recursos Minerales de Mexico (CRM). An integrated, readily accessible, modern digital data base of magnetic anomaly data spanning North America will be a powerful tool for evaluating the structure, geologic processes, and tectonic evolution of the continent, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extrapolation of contacts and structural trends into areas covered by Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks (~90% of the continental U.S.) is aided by interpretation of aeromagnetic data (North American Magnetic Anomaly Group, 2002). Aeromagnetic maps have been used in the interpretation of basement lithotypes and structure, including the western United States (e.g., Lidiak, 1974;Ramberg and Smithson, 1975;Cordell and Grauch, 1985;Finn et al, 2001;Sims and Stein, 2003;Grauch et al, 2003;Finn and Sims, 2005), Canada (e.g., Pilkington et al, 2000;Ross et al, 1991), Australia (e.g., Gunn et al, 1997), and elsewhere (e.g., Henkel, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrapolation of contacts and structural trends into areas covered by Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks (~90% of the continental U.S.) is aided by interpretation of aeromagnetic data (North American Magnetic Anomaly Group, 2002). Aeromagnetic maps have been used in the interpretation of basement lithotypes and structure, including the western United States (e.g., Lidiak, 1974;Ramberg and Smithson, 1975;Cordell and Grauch, 1985;Finn et al, 2001;Sims and Stein, 2003;Grauch et al, 2003;Finn and Sims, 2005), Canada (e.g., Pilkington et al, 2000;Ross et al, 1991), Australia (e.g., Gunn et al, 1997), and elsewhere (e.g., Henkel, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%