2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of clustered source points can be reduced by statistical criteria to obtain the most reliable results. Source points were selected according to three criteria: minimum standard deviation (Thompson 1982), the minimum condition number from a singular value decomposition (FitzGerald et al 2004), and points with the smallest error from the Euler equation (Cooper 2004). For the study area, we calculated Euler source points with SI = 0, 1, 2 and different window sizes 100, 200, 500 km in order to include long and very long wavelengths in the anomalies.…”
Section: Euler-deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of clustered source points can be reduced by statistical criteria to obtain the most reliable results. Source points were selected according to three criteria: minimum standard deviation (Thompson 1982), the minimum condition number from a singular value decomposition (FitzGerald et al 2004), and points with the smallest error from the Euler equation (Cooper 2004). For the study area, we calculated Euler source points with SI = 0, 1, 2 and different window sizes 100, 200, 500 km in order to include long and very long wavelengths in the anomalies.…”
Section: Euler-deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li (2003) selects a single anomaly and applies the Euler deconvolution to this selected anomaly by using a single data window. FitzGerald et al (2004) present a comprehensive review of practical techniques that are usually used to distinguish reliable from spurious Euler solutions. Jekeli (2009) shows that the ad hoc criterion often used to accept Euler solutions (Reid et al, 1990) yields better results than the probabilistically founded test (using the Student and Fisher distributions for random variables) that determines whether an estimate of a parameter is reasonably consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) solutions with the lowest standard deviation (Thompson 1982); (2) solutions with the lowest condition number resulting from a singular value decomposition procedure that is used for solving the system of equations (Fitzgerald et al 2004); (3) solutions from the Euler interpretation equation with the smallest error (Cooper 2004).…”
Section: Euler-deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%