2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b07811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Insights into the Structure Changes and Interface Properties of Li3VO4 Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries during the Initial Cycle by in-Situ Techniques

Abstract: Li3VO4 has been regarded as a new-type anode of lithium-ion batteries in recent years, which has a high theoretical specific capacity of 394 mAh g(-1), a proper potential for Li(+) insertion/deinsertion (∼1 V), and a good rate capacity. However, its low initial Coulombic efficiency, poor conductivity, and poor cycle performance restricts its development. In order to figure out the cause of the low initial Coulombic efficiency of Li3VO4 material, the nanosized Li3VO4 material was synthesized by citric acid-assi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure d presents the percent contribution of separate capacitive and diffusion‐controlled charge contributions measured at different scan rates. The Li‐ion diffusion coefficient in MnO 2 @C‐NS electrode was further estimated by the Randles–Sevick equationinormalp = 2.69 × 105n3/2ADLi1/2ν1/2Cwhere i p is current maximum in amps (we considered current value at three points), n is number of electrons involved in the charge storage, A is electrode area in cm 2 (for simplicity we have considered geometrical area), D Li is diffusion coefficient in cm 2 s −1 , ν is scan rate in V s −1 , and C is concentration of Li‐ion in mol cm −3 . The diffusion coefficients for MnO 2 @C‐NS calculated at different points are in the range of 10 −9 ‐ 10 −11 cm 2 s −1 for different scan rates (see Figure S6b, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure d presents the percent contribution of separate capacitive and diffusion‐controlled charge contributions measured at different scan rates. The Li‐ion diffusion coefficient in MnO 2 @C‐NS electrode was further estimated by the Randles–Sevick equationinormalp = 2.69 × 105n3/2ADLi1/2ν1/2Cwhere i p is current maximum in amps (we considered current value at three points), n is number of electrons involved in the charge storage, A is electrode area in cm 2 (for simplicity we have considered geometrical area), D Li is diffusion coefficient in cm 2 s −1 , ν is scan rate in V s −1 , and C is concentration of Li‐ion in mol cm −3 . The diffusion coefficients for MnO 2 @C‐NS calculated at different points are in the range of 10 −9 ‐ 10 −11 cm 2 s −1 for different scan rates (see Figure S6b, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, to quantify the EIS results of different degrees of lithium insertion, a series of fittings were done, as shown in Fig. 7(b) [27]. The Nyquist plots were fitted by the two-time constant model ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the experimental data show that this transformation may continue via an intermediate Phase II to the further lithiated Phase III. The XRD patterns of the Phase II and Phase III cannot be indexed due to the lack of crystallographic information; however, the disappearance of the intermediate Phase II on the first lithiation proposes a different lithiation mechanism from previous reports . Furthermore, the suggested antifluorite‐type Li 6 VO 4 (3.0 Li + ) structure at a deep lithiation level was not observed, probably because the LVO‐BM does not achieve full lithiation (3.0 Li + ) but only the nominal composition of Li 5.4 VO 4 (2.4 Li + ) in the present in situ experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A clear trend in all experiments is observed: the irreversible specific charge “loss” in the first cycle is nearly constant at every C‐rate (C/30 and C/200) for the LVO‐BM electrodes. The irreversible specific charge “loss” in the first cycle can be associated mainly with irreversible phase transformation that the LVO material undergoes due to Li + insertion into the original structure and/or due to irreversible parasitic processes such as electrolyte decomposition and SEI formation . Based on the above results, the first hypothesis seems more plausible because there is no obvious dependence on time spent under highly reducing conditions (see Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation