2010
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53238-1.00002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Monetarist Economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
40
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The conditions under which gift and monetary exchange systems can be rationalized as equilibrium outcomes have recently become the subject of a large theoretical literature in modern monetary economics employing microfounded search-theoretic models (see Lagos, Rocheteau, & Wright, 2014;Nosal &Rocheteau, 2011 andWilliamson &Wright, 2011 for surveys). These models make clear the frictions and assumptions under which gift exchange and monetary exchange systems can be rationalized as an equilibrium phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions under which gift and monetary exchange systems can be rationalized as equilibrium outcomes have recently become the subject of a large theoretical literature in modern monetary economics employing microfounded search-theoretic models (see Lagos, Rocheteau, & Wright, 2014;Nosal &Rocheteau, 2011 andWilliamson &Wright, 2011 for surveys). These models make clear the frictions and assumptions under which gift exchange and monetary exchange systems can be rationalized as an equilibrium phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing (D11) and (D12) shows that f c > f c because f d < f d and < 1. Given f c > f c , (D10) and (30) imply that h < h . Rewriting (D2) yields…”
Section: Appendix C: Dynamic Properties Of the Search Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To highlight the novelty of this study, it is helpful to …rst discuss two related branches of literature in monetary economics. First, this study relates to the search-andmatching literature on money and capital formation; see for example, Shi (1999), Menner (2006), Williamson and Wright (2010), Aruoba et al (2011), Bencivenga and Camera (2011) and Waller (2011). This branch of literature analyzes the relationship between money and capital formation in a search-theoretic framework without considering economic growth as an endogenous process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least two interpretations. One is that  insists on quid pro quo,  is holding transferable assets worth , and he cannot hand over more than he has (as in many monetary models; see Williamson and Wright 2010 for a survey). Another is that  can secure a loan from  -trade credit -to be paid off in the next centralized market, but only up to the value  of his assets that he can pledge as collateral (as in many imperfect credit models; see Gertler and Kiyotaki 2010 for a survey).…”
Section: Technology Transfer With Imperfect Creditmentioning
confidence: 99%