2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-021-01796-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New software tools, databases, and resources in metabolomics: updates from 2020

Abstract: Background Precision medicine, space exploration, drug discovery to characterization of dark chemical space of habitats and organisms, metabolomics takes a centre stage in providing answers to diverse biological, biomedical, and environmental questions. With technological advances in mass-spectrometry and spectroscopy platforms that aid in generation of information rich datasets that are complex big-data, data analytics tend to co-evolve to match the pace of analytical instrumentation. Software to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MS is more sensitive and can detect a wider range of metabolites but is less reproducible compared to NMR. Although MS has been criticized to provide less information on chemical identity than NMR, MS fragmentation as well as recent advancements in bioinformatic methods for the automatic annotation of chromatographic-mass spectral data can provide some structural information [77][78][79][80]. The advantages and disadvantages of NMR and MS have been reviewed previously [66] and are briefly described below.…”
Section: Analytical Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS is more sensitive and can detect a wider range of metabolites but is less reproducible compared to NMR. Although MS has been criticized to provide less information on chemical identity than NMR, MS fragmentation as well as recent advancements in bioinformatic methods for the automatic annotation of chromatographic-mass spectral data can provide some structural information [77][78][79][80]. The advantages and disadvantages of NMR and MS have been reviewed previously [66] and are briefly described below.…”
Section: Analytical Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps are dependent on the instrument (e.g., GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR) used to acquire the data. For MS-based instrumentation, if vendor-specific software is not used, data files need to be converted to an open file format (e.g., mzML, netCDF, ABF) to be further processed with open-source software packages, such as MS-DIAL, XCMS, MZmine, and OpenMS [ 106 , 107 ]. The software can be used to perform peak picking, deconvolution, alignment across samples, and in some cases, the same software can perform metabolite annotation with experimental and/or in silico libraries (e.g., MS-DIAL [ 108 ]).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational techniques can address the challenge of isotope and adduct annotation, including the well-known R package CAMERA (based on peak grouping after retention time and peak shape correlation to form groups of ions, followed by annotation of possible isotopes and adducts) and the more recent web application MS-FLO (based on several parameters such as peak height, retention time alignment and mass similarities to detect adducts, isotopes and duplicate features in a preprocessed dataset) [ 109 , 110 ]. The number of software packages, databases for metabolite annotation, and processing tools increase every year, with the most recent developments compiled in a review paper by Misra [ 107 ].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved using different online databases, such as Metaboanalyst, The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Reactome (see Cox et al, 2017 for a detailed review). Moreover, different mathematical and computational methods are available for integrating gene expression and metabolomics data (McIntyre et al, 2020;Jendoubi, 2021;Misra, 2021).…”
Section: Technical Approaches and Challenges Of Insect Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%