2018
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201800149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Strategies in the Design of Nanomedicines to Oppose Uptake by the Mononuclear Phagocyte System and Enhance Cancer Therapeutic Efficacy

Abstract: The application of nanotechnology in the treatment of tumors has boomed owing to the vigorous development in cancer nanomedicine. Despite the great success achieved in this field, nanomedicine has not realized its full potential owing to a delivery barrier, the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS), which cuts off more than 95 % of the administrated nanoparticles. This results in an extremely low drug-delivery efficacy to the tumor and leads to poor therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the injection of excess nanopar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By fluorescence analysis, we observed the highest accumulation of EVs in the liver (Fig. 6d, e), which was to be expected, as the liver is a highly irrigated organ where most of the nanoparticles tend to accumulate, including EVs [13,60]. Importantly, we observed no significant differences between the distribution of EV-AuNPs and control EVs, indicating that AuNPs did not affect systemic distribution (Fig.…”
Section: Tracking Double-labeled B16f10-ev Accumulation In Metastaticsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…By fluorescence analysis, we observed the highest accumulation of EVs in the liver (Fig. 6d, e), which was to be expected, as the liver is a highly irrigated organ where most of the nanoparticles tend to accumulate, including EVs [13,60]. Importantly, we observed no significant differences between the distribution of EV-AuNPs and control EVs, indicating that AuNPs did not affect systemic distribution (Fig.…”
Section: Tracking Double-labeled B16f10-ev Accumulation In Metastaticsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In principle, cationic nanoparticles have higher affinity for macrophages than neutral and anionic nanomaterials. 33 Attachment of surface protein, such as opsonins may result in opsonization and subsequent phagocytosis. The negative zeta potential of the AGuIX@PS@KDKPPR nanoparticle characterizes its surface charge, which is essential for preventing opsonization in vivo and contributes to successfully achieve an effective targeting.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Physicochemical Characterization And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will slightly change the secondary structure of the proteins and lead to the formation of both soft and hard protein corona. [22][23][24] Formation of protein corona on nanomaterials will affect the surface of nanomaterials and their subsequent interaction with biological molecules (biodistribution and penetrance) and cellular compartments. 18,25 The composition, properties and formation of protein corona are influenced by physiochemical properties (size, shape, surface area, charge, chemical composition, functionalization, colloidal stability, porosity, etc.)…”
Section: (I) Interaction Of Nanomaterials With Serum Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%