2017
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1375546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

News media’s position-taking regarding the European Union: the synchronization of mass media’s reporting and commentating in the 2014 European Parliament elections

Abstract: We analyse whether a newspaper's editorial position regarding the European Union is related to its selection decisions in the news section. We ask whether such a synchronization between news and editorials exists, whether it is conditioned by the type of media system and under which conditions it also affects the selection of transnational voices. Our study is based on a quantitative content analysis of the quality press in seven European countries (Austria,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although the editorial is an institutional opinion space, FSP seeks to behave in a way that is perceived as balanced even in the opinion spaces. Thus, in relation to the difficulty of expressing opinion in a space of tensions, professionals comment on how rigorous the company seeks to be in an attempt to avoid the permeability in the wall that divides facts and opinions, something that the international literature has already worked to measure (Adam et al, 2017;Berkel, 2006;Druckman & Parkin, 2005;Eilders, 1999;Gronemeyer & Porath, 2015;Ho & Quinn, 2008). Machado (interview, June 4, 2017) treats the separation between opinion and information as a consensus, assigning its resolution to the rules established in the Manual of Style and Usage.…”
Section: Editorial Values Of the Journalistic Companymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, although the editorial is an institutional opinion space, FSP seeks to behave in a way that is perceived as balanced even in the opinion spaces. Thus, in relation to the difficulty of expressing opinion in a space of tensions, professionals comment on how rigorous the company seeks to be in an attempt to avoid the permeability in the wall that divides facts and opinions, something that the international literature has already worked to measure (Adam et al, 2017;Berkel, 2006;Druckman & Parkin, 2005;Eilders, 1999;Gronemeyer & Porath, 2015;Ho & Quinn, 2008). Machado (interview, June 4, 2017) treats the separation between opinion and information as a consensus, assigning its resolution to the rules established in the Manual of Style and Usage.…”
Section: Editorial Values Of the Journalistic Companymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of the impressions reported by professionals, it is worth considering that, although the interviewees statements ensure the untying between fact and opinion, international studies dedicated to investigating such interference have found some porosity between opinion and news sections, both in terms of issues agenda (Druckman & Parkin, 2005), concerning the direction adopted by opinions (Eilders, 1999) or the sources heard (Adam et al, 2017). Thus, the perception of the interviewees about the independence of news reporters in relation to institutional opinion (characterized in the opinion section) is not enough to ensure that the positions presented in the editorials do not spill over the direction of the news reports.…”
Section: Patumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assumed that such a national "filter" exists for the selection and presentation of public statements on the economic and financial crisis (Zamponi and Bosi 2016;Sommer et al 2016) and that such a national filter is linked to the functioning and orientation patterns of mass media (Bijsmans and Altides 2007;Boomgaarden et al 2013;Adam et al 2019). However, this is not the only reason, because if the media were the central driving force behind this national bias, this would be reflected in our data set.…”
Section: Public Debates On the Crisis: Interlocked Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Collective identities play a role, as well, given that EU-related attitudes largely depend on the extent to which citizens have developed a feeling of belonging to Europe, while the attachment to the nation state might be conducive to opposition to the EU (de Vries and van Kersbergen 2007;Hooghe and Marks 2005;. Finally, media consumption has a significant impact on critical attitudes because the mass media are actively engaged in shaping public opinions and tend to lean towards critical news coverage that nurtures Eurosceptic attitudes among their users (de Vreese and Boomgaarden 2006;Maier and Rittberger 2008;Conti and Memoli 2017;Galpin and Trenz 2019;Adam et al 2019). These standard predictors have thus been proven to convincingly explain the likelihood of Eurosceptic attitudes among respondents.…”
Section: Determining Levels and Correlates Of Euroscepticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all vertical and horizontal linkages, even banal ones, can help integrating a transnational arena, it is still an intriguing question how substantively meaningful for European politics vertical and horizontal linkages are. Based on previous research on EU coverage in newspapers (Adam et al 2019), lists of EU-related keywords were compiled for all languages. We performed a dictionary analysis to investigate their occurrence in all tweets that include at least one linkage, i.e.…”
Section: Robustness Tests and Tweet Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%