Ni–YSZ(111) solid–solid interfacial energy

Nahor, Hadar; Meltzman, Hila; Kaplan, Wayne D.

doi:10.1007/s10853-013-7960-y

Cited by 22 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…. Two different low‐index orientation relationships (ORs) were recently identified:

Ni false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 1 ) and

Ni false[\overset{1}{true} 10 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 2 ). Using the <112> zone axis, the equivalent OR to OR 1 is

Ni false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

and the equivalent OR to OR 2 is

Ni false[\overset{1}{true} \overset{1}{true} 2 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It should be noted that SAD patterns as well as HRTEM micrographs of the two <112>‐ORs are identical, thus it is impossible to determine the exact OR (equivalent to OR 1 or OR 2 ) based on SAD or HRTEM alone. Since the <112> projection is identical in both cases, and since particles oriented with OR 1 have a lower interface energy than those with OR 2, it is more likely that a Ni particle sectioned in the <112> projection is oriented with the substrate in the lower interface energy OR. Therefore, the <112> viewing direction shown in this work is treated as <112>‐OR 1 :

Ni false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

, i.e., complementary to

Ni false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1. Two different lowindex orientation relationships (ORs) were recently identified 23 : Ni½1 10ð111Þ YSZ½1 10 ð111Þ (OR 1 ) and Ni½ 110ð111Þ YSZ½1 10…”

Section: (1) Tem Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Structure of the Equilibrated Ni(111)‐YSZ(111) Solid–Solid Interface

Nahor

Kaplan

2015

J. Am. Ceram. Soc.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Solid‐state dewetting of continuous Ni films deposited on the (111) surface of yttrium‐stabilized zirconia (YSZ) was used to produce equilibrated Ni particles, and the solid–solid interface structure was determined using aberration‐corrected transmission electron microscopy. The ~150 nm thick Ni films were annealed at 1350°C in Ar + H2 (99.9999%) at a partial pressure of oxygen of 10−20 atm for 6 h. Transmission electron microscopy of equilibrated particles, which was conducted to analyze the structure at the interface, revealed that despite the 31% lattice mismatch between Ni and YSZ, the interface is semicoherent and a two‐dimensional network of misfit dislocations was identified.

show abstract

“…. Two different low‐index orientation relationships (ORs) were recently identified:

Ni false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 1 ) and

Ni false[\overset{1}{true} 10 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 2 ). Using the <112> zone axis, the equivalent OR to OR 1 is

Ni false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

and the equivalent OR to OR 2 is

Ni false[\overset{1}{true} \overset{1}{true} 2 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ni false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[11 \overset{2}{true} false] false(111 false)

, i.e., complementary to

Ni false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false) ∥YSZ false[1 \overset{1}{true} 0 false] false(111 false)

(OR 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Structure of the Equilibrated Ni(111)‐YSZ(111) Solid–Solid Interface

Nahor

Kaplan

2015

J. Am. Ceram. Soc.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the present study Ni (FCC) particles were equilibrated on single crystal (001) YSZ (cubic fluorite structure) substrates via solid‐state dewetting, in a manner similar to our previous studies on (111) YSZ substrates . The ORs between the equilibrated particles and the substrate were examined, and the interface energy was measured from fully equilibrated particles.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Laguna‐Bercero and Larrea studied Ni‐YSZ interfaces prepared by the reduction of NiO‐YSZ directionally solidified eutectics and found four different ORs:

Ni [110] (1 \bar{1} 1) | | YSZ [100] (002)

Ni [110] (1 \bar{1} 1) | | YSZ [110] (002)

Ni [100] (002) | | YSZ [110] (002)

, and

Ni [110] (002) | | YSZ [110] (002)

. In our previous work, we studied equilibrated Ni‐YSZ interfaces formed via solid‐state dewetting on single crystal (111) YSZ substrates and found two ORs, similar to some of the ORs mentioned above:

Ni [1 \bar{1} 0] (111) | | YSZ [1 \bar{1} 0] (111)

, and

Ni [\bar{1} 10] (111) | | YSZ [1 \bar{1} 0] (111)

…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ni‐YSZ(001) solid‐solid interfacial energy and orientation relationships

Nahor

Kaplan

2018

J Am Ceram Soc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Equilibrated Ni particles were produced via solid-state dewetting of continuous Ni films deposited on the (001) surface of yttrium stabilized zirconia (YSZ). The solid-solid interface energy of the equilibrated Ni(111)-YSZ(001) interface was determined using Winterbottom analysis. Two low-index orientation relationships (ORs) were found using the selected area electron diffraction patterns in transmission electron microscopy: Ni½1 10ð111Þ jj YSZ ½100ð002Þ (OR 1 ) and Ni½1 10ð111Þ jj YSZ ½110ð002Þ (OR 2 ). However, many particles were found to deviate from these low-index ORs while maintaining the out-of-plane orientation, Nið111Þ jj YSZð002Þ. The interface energy was measured to be 2.5 ± 0.1 J/m 2 regardless of the in-plane orientation. The orientation distribution was determined using electron backscattered diffraction for Ni particles on both (111) and (001) YSZ substrates and was found to correlate well with the interface energies measured in a previous study for the interface and in the present study for the Ni-YSZ(001) interface.

show abstract

Understanding and Engineering Interfacial Adhesion in Solid‐State Batteries with Metallic Anodes

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High performance alkali metal anode solid‐state batteries require solid/solid interfaces with fast ion transfer that are morphologically and chemically stable upon electrochemical cycling. Void formation at the alkali metal/solid‐state electrolyte interface during alkali metal stripping is responsible for constriction resistances and hotspots that can facilitate dendrite propagation and failure. Both externally applied pressures (35–400 MPa) and temperatures above the melting point of the alkali metal have been shown to improve the interfacial contact with the solid electrolyte, preventing the formation of voids. However, the extreme pressure and temperature conditions required can be difficult to meet for commercial solid‐state battery applications. In this review, we highlight the importance of interfacial adhesion or ‘wetting’ at alkali metal/solid electrolyte interfaces for achieving solid‐state batteries that can withstand high current densities without cell failure. The intrinsically poor adhesion at metal/ceramic interfaces poses fundamental limitations on many inorganics solid‐state electrolyte systems in the absence of applied pressure. Suppression of alkali metal voids can only be achieved for systems with high interfacial adhesion (i. e. ‘perfect wetting’) where the contact angle between the alkali metal and the solid‐state electrolyte surface goes to θ=0°. We identify key strategies to improve interfacial adhesion and suppress void formation including the adoption of interlayers, alloy anodes and 3D scaffolds. Computational modeling techniques have been invaluable for understanding the structure, stability and adhesion of solid‐state battery interfaces and we provide an overview of key techniques. Although focused on alkali metal solid‐state batteries, the fundamental understanding of interfacial adhesion discussed in this review has broader applications across the field of chemistry and material science from corrosion to biomaterials development.

show abstract

Ni–YSZ(111) solid–solid interfacial energy

Cited by 22 publications

References 41 publications

Structure of the Equilibrated Ni(111)‐YSZ(111) Solid–Solid Interface

Structure of the Equilibrated Ni(111)‐YSZ(111) Solid–Solid Interface

Ni‐YSZ(001) solid‐solid interfacial energy and orientation relationships

Understanding and Engineering Interfacial Adhesion in Solid‐State Batteries with Metallic Anodes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About