1996
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.35.1231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrogen Ion Implantation and Thermal Annealing in 6H–SiC Single Crystal

Abstract: The interrelationships among implantation-induced defect density, carrier activation rate, substrate temperature during nitrogen implantation and annealing in 6H–SiC have been clarified. Several defects, whose energy required for recovery of lattice damage depends on the substrate temperature during implantation, were examined. Although defect density was sufficiently low that it was undetectable by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, the carrier activation rate was 3.3% under the condition that the implan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the N͑C͒ configuration is energetically more favorable is in agreement with experimental observations, but the difference of formation energies for N͑Si͒ and N͑C͒ configurations is larger than that obtained in the previous theoretical study of Miyajima et al 6 The origin for this discrepancy may be attributed to the different approximations used in Ref. 6, although a rigorous analysis is not possible since details of their calculations were not given. As expected, the most stable charge state of the dopant at zero temperature depends on the position of the electron chemical potential e .…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That the N͑C͒ configuration is energetically more favorable is in agreement with experimental observations, but the difference of formation energies for N͑Si͒ and N͑C͒ configurations is larger than that obtained in the previous theoretical study of Miyajima et al 6 The origin for this discrepancy may be attributed to the different approximations used in Ref. 6, although a rigorous analysis is not possible since details of their calculations were not given. As expected, the most stable charge state of the dopant at zero temperature depends on the position of the electron chemical potential e .…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, a N atom at a Si lattice site relaxes to an off-center position, which is ϳ0.4 Å from the perfect lattice Si site, lengthening the bond to one of the nearest neighbors and shortening the remaining three bonds, in agreement with previous results. 6,7 We predict that a N substitutional is most stable by far at a N͑C͒ site; the energy difference between the N͑Si͒ and N͑C͒ is approximately 6 eV throughout the range of doping conditions. That the N͑C͒ configuration is energetically more favorable is in agreement with experimental observations, but the difference of formation energies for N͑Si͒ and N͑C͒ configurations is larger than that obtained in the previous theoretical study of Miyajima et al 6 The origin for this discrepancy may be attributed to the different approximations used in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first principle local‐density functional calculations 33 for the N atom on C and Si sites indicates that due to the different charge density distributions around the N atom on C and Si site the N C center acts as a shallow donor while the N Si center due to the strong localization of the wave function does not constitute a shallow donor state. This conclusion is consistent with the distribution of the electronic wave function around N donor found for N k1 and N k2 from ENDOR measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] However, implanted N atoms tend to be electrically inactive at a N concentration of more than 2 ϫ10 19 cm Ϫ3 due to the molecules and/or precipitates they form during postimplantation annealing. [5][6][7][8] However, implanted N atoms tend to be electrically inactive at a N concentration of more than 2 ϫ10 19 cm Ϫ3 due to the molecules and/or precipitates they form during postimplantation annealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%