No Choices, No Chances: How Contemporary Enterprise Culture is Failing Britain's Underclasses

Abstract

<jats:p> Despite an increasing interest in minority entrepreneurship in recent years, the issue of ‘underclass entrepreneurship’ and its linkages to ‘enterprise culture’ remain underresearched. In this article, the authors examine ‘chavs’ as an indigenous British underclass. Using data gathered from an Internet search and newspaper cuttings, they examine how this silent ‘stereotyped’ and socially constructed minority is presented as dangerous and unemployable. In the process, they uncover hidden links between the underclass and enterprise culture, and analyse how entrepreneurship can help such minorities to achieve inclusivity via consideration of role theory and the power of narrative in initiating social transformation. This framework helps us to understand how it is possible to direct young, disadvantaged individuals towards an entrepreneurial career path via self-employment. The paper raises intriguing issues relating to youth employment and tells the story of how contemporary enterprise culture is failing one of Britain's silent minorities. </jats:p>

Entrepreneurship, Leadership, and the Value of Feminist Approaches to Understanding Them

“…Elsewhere, entrepreneurship is considered in terms of its potential to foster greater social equality in the face of structural (and other) inequalities in the employment market (e.g., Calás, Smircich, and Bourne ; Ram et al. ; Smith and Air ). But these as units of analysis are rare, relative to the canon of studies that use the pursuit of growth at the firm level as the feature that defines entrepreneurship.…”

Poverty, social exclusion and enterprise policy: A study of UK policies’ effectiveness over 40 years

“…Identifying a 'dependency culture' in the old industrial regions of the north and west of the United Kingdom (Bosworth and Gray, 2012), the Thatcher government embarked on a strategy of withdrawing support for nationalized industries that had been the bases of many of these communities, fattened parts up for privatization, which happened to be closer to the south east of the United Kingdom, and left the populations and their business sectors to try and grasp opportunities for endogenous growth. A key element in addressing what were perceived to be the fundamental problems of these economies -low birth rate of new firms, lack of enterprise and dependency on large plants of nationalized and multinational companieswas the introduction of a range of measures to promote enterprise (Smith and Air, 2012). Many of them were intended to generate an entrepreneurial culture among the unemployed, the redundant, those who were barely economically active in heavily unionized communities.…”

Welfare rights, self-help and social enterprise: Unpicking neoliberalism’s mess

“…Others have sought to explain the entanglement of entrepreneurialism with social welfare as representative of neoliberal individualism (e.g. Kelly et al, 2013; Smith and Air, 2012). As with similar market-based initiatives, such as microfinance, social enterprises articulate their purpose around intervening into persistent social ‘problems’ through expanding the circulation of capital.…”