2013
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of IGH‐MALT1 translocation in the Ma‐1 cell line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the unique IGH/MALT1 fusion was more readily detected in MA-1.46 than in the parental MA-1 cells, suggesting that MA-1.46 is a more homogenous t(14;18) (q32;q21)/ IGH-MALT1-containing cell line. In summary, despite sharing the same STR as Pfeiffer, we provided further evidence not only to demonstrate that MA-1 and its MA-1.46 subclones are cytogenetically different from Pfeiffer cells (Capes-Davis et al, 2013b) but also to reinforce our argument to the comment of Flossbach et al (2013) (Kuo et al, 2013). We thus believe MA-1 and its MA-1.46 subclone can be useful in dissecting the molecular pathogenesis of t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1containing B-cell lymphoma.…”
Section: Dear Editorssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, the unique IGH/MALT1 fusion was more readily detected in MA-1.46 than in the parental MA-1 cells, suggesting that MA-1.46 is a more homogenous t(14;18) (q32;q21)/ IGH-MALT1-containing cell line. In summary, despite sharing the same STR as Pfeiffer, we provided further evidence not only to demonstrate that MA-1 and its MA-1.46 subclones are cytogenetically different from Pfeiffer cells (Capes-Davis et al, 2013b) but also to reinforce our argument to the comment of Flossbach et al (2013) (Kuo et al, 2013). We thus believe MA-1 and its MA-1.46 subclone can be useful in dissecting the molecular pathogenesis of t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1containing B-cell lymphoma.…”
Section: Dear Editorssupporting
confidence: 77%