2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/pcs48520.2019.8954551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-Reference Light Field Image Quality Assessment Based on Micro-Lens Image

Abstract: Light field image quality assessment (LF-IQA) plays a significant role due to its guidance to Light Field (LF) contents acquisition, processing and application. The LF can be represented as 4-D signal, and its quality depends on both angular consistency and spatial quality. However, few existing LF-IQA methods concentrate on effects caused by angular inconsistency. Especially, no-reference methods lack effective utilization of 2-D angular information. In this paper, we focus on measuring the 2-D angular consis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BELIF [78], QMLI [79], LFQA-DSA [13], LFQA [10], Cui et al [80], ALAS-DADS [14], Alamgeer and Farias [81]. The results, reported in Table V, show that the proposed metric outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With State-of-the-art Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…BELIF [78], QMLI [79], LFQA-DSA [13], LFQA [10], Cui et al [80], ALAS-DADS [14], Alamgeer and Farias [81]. The results, reported in Table V, show that the proposed metric outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With State-of-the-art Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…As performance evaluation methods, we used only the Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient (SROCC) and the Pearson's Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) for simplicity. We compared the proposed NR LF-IQA method with the following state-of-art LF-IQA methods: MDFM (Tian et al, 2018), LFIQM (Paudyal et al, 2019), Fang et al (Fang et al, 2018), SDFM (Tian et al, 2020b), Meng et al (Meng et al, 2020), LGF-LFC (Tian et al, 2020a), NR-LFQA (Shi et al, 2019a), LF-QMLI (Luo et al, 2019), Jiang et al (Jiang et al, 2018), BELIF Shi et al, 2020). We also compared the proposed method with the following 2D image/video quality metrics: PSNR-YUV (Sze et al, 2014), IW-PSNR (Wang and Li, 2011), FI-PSNR (Lin and Wu, 2014), MW-PSNR (Sandić-Stanković et al, 2016), SSIM (Wang et al, 2004), IW-SSIM (Wang and Li, 2011), UQI (Zhou and Bovik, 2002), VIF , MJ3DFR (Chen et al, 2013), GMSD (Xue et al, 2014), NICE (Rouse and Hemami, 2009) and STMAD (Vu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NR LFQA method proposed by Shi et al (Shi et al, 2019a) predicts quality using EPI information and natural statistics. The NR LF-IQA method proposed by Luo et al (Luo et al, 2019) employs the spatial information from SAIs and the angular information from the micro-lens images. Jiang et al (Jiang et al, 2018) proposed a FR LF-IQA method that uses the entropy information and the gradient magnitude features to extract spacial features from the SAIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a suitable subjective method can support and strengthen the results of objective methods. Currently, the objective quality assessment for LF images is an active area of research [12][13][14]. There is a focus on the design of LF-IQA metrics that consider the LF characteristics (i.e., changing color information with view angle and depth information) through the analysis and extraction of LF features.…”
Section: 𝑃 = 𝐿(𝑢 𝑣 𝑠 𝑡)mentioning
confidence: 99%